Tools
Toolstools
Providers using this tag (79)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 5 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 16 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 26 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 19 Limited public surface area
Emerging 11 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 2 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (75)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 5 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 16 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 24 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 20 Limited public surface area
Emerging 9 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 79 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Tools, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 49.8 | 17.5 | +32.3 | 79 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 43.7 | 17.9 | +25.8 | 79 |
| Access Clarity | 43.7 | 22.3 | +21.4 | 79 |
| Operational Transparency | 32.4 | 11.3 | +21.1 | 79 |
| Discoverability | 74.8 | 60.4 | +14.4 | 79 |
| Contract Governance | 16.1 | 6.4 | +9.7 | 79 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 42% | 16% | +26 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 27% | 7% | +20 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 15% | 9% | +6 |
| Security | 99% | 88% | +11 |
| Arazzo workflows | 11% | 2% | +9 |
| Governance rules | 37% | 13% | +24 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Vapi 75.1
- 2 Adobe Suite 71.2
- 3 Infobip 71
- 4 Dust 67.6
- 5 Novu 66.6
- 6 Syllable 64.8
- 7 Landing.ai 64.2
- 8 OpenAI 64.2
- 9 Seekr 61.3
- 10 Workato 61.3
- 1 Adobe Suite 61.5
- 2 Monid 56.5
- 3 Clarifeye 53.8
- 4 Larridin 53.1
- 5 Tradeshift 50.9
- 6 Facilio 50.2
- 7 Infobip 47.7
- 8 AppDirect 41.5
- 9 Phonic 40.8
- 10 BCB Group 40.4
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.
MCP server
One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.
https://apis.io/mcp
Tools for tags
7 MCP tools reach this
find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
Call it yourself
curl for this page
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/tools"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/tools"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/tools/stats" \
-H "X-API-Key: $APIS_IO_KEY"
Discovery needs no key. Ratings and market analysis are Pro.