Reviews
Providers using this tag (72)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 12 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 13 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 18 Limited public surface area
Emerging 14 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 12 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (89)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 4 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 18 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 40 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 20 Limited public surface area
Emerging 7 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (60)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Reviews” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Show all 60 companies ↓
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 67 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Reviews, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 42.9 | 26.5 | +16.4 | 67 |
| Contract Quality | 34.8 | 20.1 | +14.7 | 67 |
| Operational Transparency | 21.5 | 14 | +7.5 | 67 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 30.9 | 23.4 | +7.5 | 67 |
| Discoverability | 66.8 | 61 | +5.8 | 67 |
| Contract Governance | 8.7 | 6.5 | +2.2 | 67 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 10% | 10% | 0 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 13% | 13% | 0 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 19% | 11% | +8 |
| Security | 99% | 96% | +3 |
| Arazzo workflows | 3% | 2% | +1 |
| Governance rules | 23% | 13% | +10 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Birdeye 75
- 2 G2 66.2
- 3 AskNicely 66.1
- 4 Weave 64.1
- 5 StayingAPI 63.6
- 6 Etsy 63.1
- 7 Synup 62.1
- 8 Bazaarvoice 61.3
- 9 Listings API 58.7
- 10 TrustRadius 58.4
- 1 Listings API 66.1
- 2 Birdeye 63.3
- 3 Synup 60.5
- 4 StayingAPI 59.4
- 5 G2 57.7
- 6 Yext 54.3
- 7 AskNicely 52.7
- 8 LaFourchette 47.2
- 9 Revinate 39.8
- 10 Podium 39.3
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.