LMS
Providers using this tag (44)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 3 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Developing 12 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 12 Limited public surface area
Emerging 13 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (35)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 3 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 1 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 8 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 15 Limited public surface area
Emerging 7 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (25)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “LMS” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 43 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged LMS, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 47.2 | 26.5 | +20.7 | 43 |
| Contract Quality | 31.6 | 17.6 | +14 | 43 |
| Operational Transparency | 26.2 | 13.7 | +12.5 | 43 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 33.5 | 23.2 | +10.3 | 43 |
| Discoverability | 63.4 | 58.1 | +5.3 | 43 |
| Contract Governance | 9.2 | 6.3 | +2.9 | 43 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 7% | 14% | -7 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 7% | 12% | -5 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 28% | 11% | +17 |
| Security | 100% | 98% | +2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 7% | 2% | +5 |
| Governance rules | 23% | 14% | +9 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Bindbee 70.4
- 2 Canvas 68.2
- 3 Canvas LMS 66.9
- 4 Exec 65.2
- 5 Go1 63.5
- 6 WorkRamp 62.8
- 7 Drillster 52.4
- 8 Thinkific 51.5
- 9 Adobe Captivate 48.5
- 10 Epignosis (TalentLMS, eFront, TalentCards) 47.7
- 1 Thinkific 54.6
- 2 Bindbee 47.1
- 3 Exec 40.2
- 4 Canvas 39.7
- 5 Adobe Captivate 36.7
- 6 Go1 36.2
- 7 Drillster 33.5
- 8 Coorpacademy 33.2
- 9 Canvas LMS 32.8
- 10 iSpring Learn 31.9
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.