Providers using this tag (54)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 3 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 4 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 12 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 17 Limited public surface area
Emerging 17 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (23)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 2 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 1 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 3 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 10 Limited public surface area
Emerging 7 Early or largely undocumented
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 54 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged LMS, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 41.6 | 22.3 | +19.3 | 54 |
| Contract Quality | 35.2 | 17.5 | +17.7 | 54 |
| Operational Transparency | 25 | 11.3 | +13.7 | 54 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 27.8 | 17.9 | +9.9 | 54 |
| Discoverability | 67.4 | 60.4 | +7 | 54 |
| Contract Governance | 8.8 | 6.4 | +2.4 | 54 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 17% | 16% | +1 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 4% | 7% | -3 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 22% | 9% | +13 |
| Security | 98% | 88% | +10 |
| Arazzo workflows | 7% | 2% | +5 |
| Governance rules | 24% | 13% | +11 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Canvas LMS 76.2
- 2 SendPulse 75.7
- 3 Exec 67.8
- 4 WorkRamp 63.2
- 5 Go1 62.2
- 6 Unified.to 60.4
- 7 Adobe Captivate 54.9
- 8 Thinkific 54.2
- 9 Epignosis (TalentLMS, eFront, TalentCards) 53.1
- 10 iSpring Learn 51.6
- 1 SendPulse 55.8
- 2 Exec 45.2
- 3 Go1 38.3
- 4 Adobe Captivate 36.7
- 5 Canvas LMS 35.4
- 6 WorkRamp 32.9
- 7 iSpring Learn 32.4
- 8 Coorpacademy 31.5
- 9 Instructure 29.9
- 10 Thinkific 29.8
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.
MCP server
One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.
https://apis.io/mcp
Tools for tags
7 MCP tools reach this
find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
Call it yourself
curl for this page
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/lms"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/lms"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/lms/stats" \
-H "X-API-Key: $APIS_IO_KEY"
Discovery needs no key. Ratings and market analysis are Pro.