E-Learning
Online LearningE-Learning
Providers using this tag (152)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 3 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 7 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 17 Limited public surface area
Emerging 63 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 61 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (1)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Thin 1 Limited public surface area
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
152 providers carry this tag directly, and 260 counting the 2 narrower tags below — 108 more to reach.
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Markets provisional
Kin Score markets whose measured providers carry this tag. Share is the fraction of the market's measured providers that carry it — it describes the market, not this tag.
| Market | Share of the market's providers |
|---|---|
| Education and Edtech | 34% |
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 136 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged E-Learning, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 29.6 | 30 | -0.4 | 136 |
| Discoverability | 55 | 59.1 | -4.1 | 136 |
| Operational Transparency | 8.7 | 13.2 | -4.5 | 136 |
| Contract Governance | 4.3 | 9.7 | -5.4 | 136 |
| Contract Quality | 9.7 | 18.6 | -8.9 | 136 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 14.8 | 24.5 | -9.7 | 136 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 8% | 18% | -10 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 8% | 16% | -8 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 8% | 13% | -5 |
| Security | 100% | 99% | +1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 2% | 1% | +1 |
| Governance rules | 16% | 36% | -20 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 360Learning 68.6
- 2 Go1 64.9
- 3 Vyond 62.9
- 4 Epignosis (TalentLMS, eFront, TalentCards) 57.3
- 5 Cloud Academy 53.1
- 6 Teachable 50.4
- 7 Agilix 48.7
- 8 Adobe Captivate 48.6
- 9 Coorpacademy 46.5
- 10 Thinkific 46.5
- 1 Thinkific 53.2
- 2 Adobe Captivate 38.4
- 3 Go1 37.9
- 4 EduBase 35.5
- 5 360Learning 34.5
- 6 Coorpacademy 31.4
- 7 Cloud Academy 30.4
- 8 iSpring Learn 29.4
- 9 Teachable 29.2
- 10 Epignosis (TalentLMS, eFront, TalentCards) 28.1
Coverage caveat. 130 of 136 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 14 November 2026, across 41591 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.