SOAP
SOAPSoapsoap
Providers using this tag (77)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 3 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 6 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 28 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 18 Limited public surface area
Emerging 19 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 3 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (91)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 4 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 15 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 34 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 20 Limited public surface area
Emerging 16 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 2 Almost no public developer surface
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 77 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged SOAP, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 41.1 | 17.5 | +23.6 | 77 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 34.4 | 17.9 | +16.5 | 77 |
| Access Clarity | 38.3 | 22.3 | +16 | 77 |
| Operational Transparency | 25.5 | 11.3 | +14.2 | 77 |
| Discoverability | 70 | 60.4 | +9.6 | 77 |
| Contract Governance | 15.1 | 6.4 | +8.7 | 77 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 23% | 16% | +7 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 5% | 7% | -2 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 27% | 9% | +18 |
| Security | 99% | 88% | +11 |
| Arazzo workflows | 10% | 2% | +8 |
| Governance rules | 47% | 13% | +34 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Salesforce Marketing Cloud 83.5
- 2 Salesforce 83.3
- 3 Oracle Siebel 67.1
- 4 Avalara 63.6
- 5 Boomi 62.3
- 6 Tebra 62.2
- 7 ERCOT 58.1
- 8 Microsoft Exchange 57.2
- 9 Microsoft Dynamics NAV 54.5
- 10 MISO 54
- 1 Salesforce Marketing Cloud 56.2
- 2 Salesforce 52.2
- 3 Avalara 46.9
- 4 Southwest Power Pool 43.3
- 5 ERCOT 40.2
- 6 Microsoft Dynamics NAV 37.3
- 7 IESO 36.2
- 8 Microsoft Exchange 33
- 9 DSV 32.3
- 10 MISO 31.5
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.
MCP server
One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.
https://apis.io/mcp
Tools for tags
7 MCP tools reach this
find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
Call it yourself
curl for this page
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/soap"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/soap"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/soap/stats" \
-H "X-API-Key: $APIS_IO_KEY"
Discovery needs no key. Ratings and market analysis are Pro.