Providers using this tag (56)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 2 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 18 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 13 Limited public surface area
Emerging 18 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 5 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (53)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Strong 2 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 19 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 14 Limited public surface area
Emerging 17 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 56 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged XML, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 35.8 | 17.5 | +18.3 | 56 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 29.5 | 17.9 | +11.6 | 56 |
| Contract Governance | 15.9 | 6.4 | +9.5 | 56 |
| Operational Transparency | 20.4 | 11.3 | +9.1 | 56 |
| Discoverability | 67.1 | 60.4 | +6.7 | 56 |
| Access Clarity | 26 | 22.3 | +3.7 | 56 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 7% | 16% | -9 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 2% | 7% | -5 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 25% | 9% | +16 |
| Security | 93% | 88% | +5 |
| Arazzo workflows | 5% | 2% | +3 |
| Governance rules | 52% | 13% | +39 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Palo Alto Networks 63.7
- 2 Lever 54.4
- 3 OpenStreetMap 52.4
- 4 PJM Interconnection 52.1
- 5 Salesforce Sales Cloud 51.1
- 6 Decisiv 50.7
- 7 Traveloka 50.4
- 8 VMware 47.7
- 9 Google Cloud Storage 47.3
- 10 OpenTravel Alliance 47.1
- 1 Decisiv 49
- 2 OpenTravel Alliance 43.9
- 3 Palo Alto Networks 39.4
- 4 Traveloka 39
- 5 Columbia University 36
- 6 Google Cloud Storage 33.1
- 7 NVD 32.5
- 8 Sage 31.7
- 9 Lever 29.1
- 10 Academy Software Foundation 28.1
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.
MCP server
One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.
https://apis.io/mcp
Tools for tags
7 MCP tools reach this
find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
Call it yourself
curl for this page
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/xml"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/xml"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/xml/stats" \
-H "X-API-Key: $APIS_IO_KEY"
Discovery needs no key. Ratings and market analysis are Pro.