Distribution
Providers using this tag (154)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 2 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 19 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 22 Limited public surface area
Emerging 54 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 56 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (64)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 4 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 5 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 17 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 14 Limited public surface area
Emerging 17 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 6 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (42)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Distribution” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
154 providers carry this tag directly, and 216 counting the 6 narrower tags below — 63 more to reach.
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Markets provisional
Kin Score markets whose measured providers carry this tag. Share is the fraction of the market's measured providers that carry it — it describes the market, not this tag.
| Market | Share of the market's providers |
|---|---|
| Travel and Airline Distribution | 28% |
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 149 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Distribution, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Governance | 7 | 6.3 | +0.7 | 149 |
| Discoverability | 58.2 | 58.1 | +0.1 | 149 |
| Operational Transparency | 12 | 13.7 | -1.7 | 149 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 21 | 23.2 | -2.2 | 149 |
| Access Clarity | 22.8 | 26.5 | -3.7 | 149 |
| Contract Quality | 13.6 | 17.6 | -4 | 149 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 7% | 14% | -7 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 6% | 12% | -6 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 15% | 11% | +4 |
| Security | 100% | 98% | +2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 3% | 2% | +1 |
| Governance rules | 3% | 14% | -11 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Oracle Hospitality 73.4
- 2 LeafLink 61
- 3 Avnet 53.3
- 4 ECI Solutions 53.2
- 5 TUI Group 53.1
- 6 APOLLO Insurance 52.4
- 7 Nextworld 51.1
- 8 Nabis 50
- 9 Endeavour Energy 49.3
- 10 Traveloka 49.3
- 1 Canix 46.2
- 2 Viator 45.9
- 3 ECI Solutions 45.1
- 4 American Express Global Business Travel 44.4
- 5 OpenTravel Alliance 40.3
- 6 TUI Group 40.1
- 7 Traveloka 39
- 8 Recurrency 37.6
- 9 LeafLink 35.8
- 10 Pax8 35.4
Coverage caveat. 139 of 149 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 5 October 2026, across 29093 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.