Distribution
Distributiondistribution
Providers using this tag (149)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 5 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 20 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 22 Limited public surface area
Emerging 52 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 47 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 3 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (68)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Strong 12 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 20 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 16 Limited public surface area
Emerging 17 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 3 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (43)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Distribution” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 143 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Distribution, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Governance | 7 | 6.3 | +0.7 | 143 |
| Discoverability | 61.1 | 61 | +0.1 | 143 |
| Operational Transparency | 12.6 | 13.9 | -1.3 | 143 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 21.4 | 23.3 | -1.9 | 143 |
| Access Clarity | 22.4 | 26.3 | -3.9 | 143 |
| Contract Quality | 15.7 | 19.8 | -4.1 | 143 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 7% | 10% | -3 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 8% | 9% | -1 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 16% | 11% | +5 |
| Security | 99% | 97% | +2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 3% | 2% | +1 |
| Governance rules | 3% | 14% | -11 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Oracle Hospitality 65.4
- 2 LeafLink 59.1
- 3 ECI Solutions 56.6
- 4 APOLLO Insurance 55.1
- 5 Endeavour Energy 54.3
- 6 U.S. Department of Transportation 52
- 7 TUI Group 50.8
- 8 Nabis 49.2
- 9 Nextworld 48.8
- 10 Traveloka 48.5
- 1 Canix 48.4
- 2 OpenTravel Alliance 46.8
- 3 Viator 45.9
- 4 American Express Global Business Travel 44.4
- 5 ECI Solutions 40.8
- 6 TUI Group 40.1
- 7 Recurrency 39.7
- 8 Traveloka 39
- 9 Klook 36.8
- 10 LeafLink 35.8
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.