Travel
Providers using this tag (536)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 4 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 15 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 53 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 89 Limited public surface area
Emerging 181 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 194 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (102)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 7 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 4 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 22 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 46 Limited public surface area
Emerging 14 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 9 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (22)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Travel” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
536 providers carry this tag directly, and 602 counting the 11 narrower tags below — 66 more to reach.
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Markets provisional
Kin Score markets whose measured providers carry this tag. Share is the fraction of the market's measured providers that carry it — it describes the market, not this tag.
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 496 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Travel, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Discoverability | 58.5 | 59.1 | -0.6 | 496 |
| Contract Governance | 8.4 | 9.7 | -1.3 | 496 |
| Access Clarity | 26.7 | 30 | -3.3 | 496 |
| Contract Quality | 14.8 | 18.6 | -3.8 | 496 |
| Operational Transparency | 8.5 | 13.2 | -4.7 | 496 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 19.2 | 24.5 | -5.3 | 496 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 20% | 18% | +2 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 18% | 16% | +2 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 11% | 13% | -2 |
| Security | 100% | 99% | +1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 1% | 1% | 0 |
| Governance rules | 30% | 36% | -6 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Oracle Hospitality 82
- 2 Perk 70.2
- 3 StayingAPI 68.6
- 4 Booking.com 66.6
- 5 Pliant 64.5
- 6 Engine 64
- 7 ReefAPI 60.7
- 8 Federal Aviation Administration 59
- 9 Wego 59
- 10 Airalo 58.4
- 1 Hotel Bergsonne Allgäu 68.4
- 2 Award Travel Finder 62.1
- 3 StayingAPI 60.2
- 4 Extralingo 59.2
- 5 Join the Student Life 56.4
- 6 Hostfully 56.3
- 7 Wego 55.4
- 8 Airport Lounge List 54.9
- 9 Travel Risk API 53.7
- 10 FlightQueue 53.3
Coverage caveat. 430 of 496 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 14 November 2026, across 41591 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.