Hospitality
Providers using this tag (359)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 5 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 12 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 30 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 58 Limited public surface area
Emerging 114 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 140 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (18)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 5 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 5 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 1 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Emerging 5 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (3)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Hospitality” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
359 providers carry this tag directly, and 462 counting the 7 narrower tags below — 103 more to reach.
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Markets provisional
Kin Score markets whose measured providers carry this tag. Share is the fraction of the market's measured providers that carry it — it describes the market, not this tag.
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 318 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Hospitality, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 27.9 | 30 | -2.1 | 318 |
| Discoverability | 56.9 | 59.1 | -2.2 | 318 |
| Contract Governance | 7.2 | 9.7 | -2.5 | 318 |
| Operational Transparency | 8.9 | 13.2 | -4.3 | 318 |
| Contract Quality | 13.4 | 18.6 | -5.2 | 318 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 18.1 | 24.5 | -6.4 | 318 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 12% | 18% | -6 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 11% | 16% | -5 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 13% | 13% | 0 |
| Security | 100% | 99% | +1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 2% | 1% | +1 |
| Governance rules | 25% | 36% | -11 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Oracle Hospitality 82
- 2 Cvent 72.6
- 3 StayingAPI 68.6
- 4 Toast 68.3
- 5 Booking.com 66.6
- 6 Cvent Hospitality Cloud 64
- 7 Cvent Social Tables 63.3
- 8 Crunchtime 61.3
- 9 Grubhub 61.3
- 10 Crunchtime Information Systems 60.2
- 1 Hotel Bergsonne Allgäu 68.4
- 2 StayingAPI 60.2
- 3 Cvent Hospitality Cloud 57.2
- 4 apaleo 56.5
- 5 Hostfully 56.3
- 6 Viator 48.1
- 7 Grubhub 47.8
- 8 Cvent 47.4
- 9 Beyond Pricing 47.1
- 10 Akia 47.1
Coverage caveat. 293 of 318 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 14 November 2026, across 41591 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.