Hotels
HotelHotels
Providers using this tag (111)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 4 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 11 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 27 Limited public surface area
Emerging 22 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 46 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (110)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 77 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 3 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 7 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 13 Limited public surface area
Emerging 7 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 3 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (5)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Hotels” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 107 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Hotels, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 18.2 | 17.6 | +0.6 | 107 |
| Discoverability | 58.2 | 58.1 | +0.1 | 107 |
| Contract Governance | 5.9 | 6.3 | -0.4 | 107 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 22.2 | 23.2 | -1 | 107 |
| Operational Transparency | 12.1 | 13.7 | -1.6 | 107 |
| Access Clarity | 21.8 | 26.5 | -4.7 | 107 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 17% | 14% | +3 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 14% | 12% | +2 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 14% | 11% | +3 |
| Security | 100% | 98% | +2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 3% | 2% | +1 |
| Governance rules | 11% | 14% | -3 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Oracle Hospitality 73.4
- 2 Booking.com 65.8
- 3 Cvent Hospitality Cloud 65.6
- 4 Cvent Social Tables 63.5
- 5 Mews 60.1
- 6 Wego 53.2
- 7 TUI Group 53.1
- 8 Engine 53
- 9 Akia 49.3
- 10 Traveloka 49.3
- 1 Cvent Hospitality Cloud 55.8
- 2 Wego 54.7
- 3 Akia 47.1
- 4 Booking.com 46.1
- 5 Sabre 46
- 6 apaleo 44.6
- 7 American Express Global Business Travel 44.4
- 8 Spotnana 42.2
- 9 OpenTravel Alliance 40.3
- 10 TUI Group 40.1
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.