Hotels
HotelHotels
Providers using this tag (111)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 4 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 11 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 23 Limited public surface area
Emerging 25 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 47 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (112)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 77 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Developing 11 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 16 Limited public surface area
Emerging 5 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 3 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (7)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Hotels” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Markets provisional
Kin Score markets whose measured providers carry this tag. Share is the fraction of the market's measured providers that carry it — it describes the market, not this tag.
| Market | Share of the market's providers |
|---|---|
| Travel and Airline Distribution | 64% |
| Hospitality Technology (hotels, PMS, channel managers) | 48% |
| OCTO Tours, Activities & Attractions Connectivity (members, known implementations, self-certification) | 21% |
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 106 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Hotels, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 18 | 17.2 | +0.8 | 106 |
| Discoverability | 58.5 | 57.9 | +0.6 | 106 |
| Contract Governance | 6 | 6.5 | -0.5 | 106 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 22.6 | 23.2 | -0.6 | 106 |
| Operational Transparency | 10.8 | 13 | -2.2 | 106 |
| Access Clarity | 19.1 | 23.9 | -4.8 | 106 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 16% | 13% | +3 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 13% | 12% | +1 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 13% | 11% | +2 |
| Security | 100% | 98% | +2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 3% | 2% | +1 |
| Governance rules | 11% | 16% | -5 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Oracle Hospitality 74
- 2 Booking.com 64.8
- 3 Cvent Hospitality Cloud 64.6
- 4 Cvent Social Tables 62
- 5 Akia 55.7
- 6 TUI Group 54.1
- 7 Mews 54
- 8 Wego 53.3
- 9 Engine 53
- 10 American Express Global Business Travel 49.8
- 1 Cvent Hospitality Cloud 57.2
- 2 Wego 55.4
- 3 Akia 47.1
- 4 Sabre 45.3
- 5 Booking.com 43.6
- 6 American Express Global Business Travel 43
- 7 Spotnana 41.9
- 8 OpenTravel Alliance 41.5
- 9 Revinate 41.3
- 10 Traveloka 40.6
Coverage caveat. 100 of 106 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 24 October 2026, across 31984 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.