Standards
Standardsstandards
Providers using this tag (108)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 10 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 12 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 21 Limited public surface area
Emerging 45 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 17 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 3 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (94)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 2 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 15 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 11 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 34 Limited public surface area
Emerging 32 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (35)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Standards” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 96 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Standards, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 28.6 | 19.8 | +8.8 | 96 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 29 | 23.4 | +5.6 | 96 |
| Contract Governance | 9.6 | 6.4 | +3.2 | 96 |
| Operational Transparency | 16.3 | 14 | +2.3 | 96 |
| Discoverability | 62.6 | 61.2 | +1.4 | 96 |
| Access Clarity | 19.8 | 26.5 | -6.7 | 96 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 9% | 10% | -1 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 10% | 13% | -3 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 16% | 11% | +5 |
| Security | 91% | 97% | -6 |
| Arazzo workflows | 2% | 2% | 0 |
| Governance rules | 28% | 14% | +14 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Trisotech 63.2
- 2 Eclipse Foundation 61.5
- 3 Netcracker 61
- 4 OpenADR Alliance 58.5
- 5 GSMA 57
- 6 ETSI 56.8
- 7 Reliance Jio 56
- 8 ACORD 55.3
- 9 MEF 55.2
- 10 Academy Software Foundation 55
- 1 EHRbase 50
- 2 Eclipse Foundation 48.4
- 3 OpenTravel Alliance 46.8
- 4 ETSI 46.2
- 5 Telia Company 44.8
- 6 GSMA 40.8
- 7 GSMA Open Gateway 40.6
- 8 3GPP 40.4
- 9 Global System for Mobile Communications 39.1
- 10 Netcracker 36.8
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.