ERP
Providers using this tag (138)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 7 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 37 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 31 Limited public surface area
Emerging 30 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 30 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 2 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (51)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 4 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 8 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 13 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 14 Limited public surface area
Emerging 12 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (14)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “ERP” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 133 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged ERP, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 28.1 | 19.8 | +8.3 | 133 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 30.7 | 23.4 | +7.3 | 133 |
| Access Clarity | 32.3 | 26.5 | +5.8 | 133 |
| Operational Transparency | 18.9 | 14 | +4.9 | 133 |
| Discoverability | 63.8 | 61.2 | +2.6 | 133 |
| Contract Governance | 7.2 | 6.4 | +0.8 | 133 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 15% | 10% | +5 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 16% | 13% | +3 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 26% | 11% | +15 |
| Security | 99% | 97% | +2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 6% | 2% | +4 |
| Governance rules | 18% | 14% | +4 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Infor 67.8
- 2 IFS 62.9
- 3 Visma 61.9
- 4 Agave 60.5
- 5 Oracle E-Business Suite 59.9
- 6 ECI Solutions 56.6
- 7 Microsoft Dynamics NAV 55.6
- 8 Conta Azul 54.4
- 9 Duvo Ai 53.9
- 10 AccountsIQ 53.1
- 1 Duvo Ai 63.1
- 2 OpenGov 63.1
- 3 Campfire 54.1
- 4 Rillet 50.8
- 5 Canix 48.4
- 6 Xentral 46.4
- 7 Visma 44.3
- 8 Agave 42.5
- 9 ECI Solutions 40.8
- 10 Recurrency 39.7
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.