Fortune 1000
Providers using this tag (304)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 3 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 3 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 19 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 30 Limited public surface area
Emerging 82 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 165 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 2 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (0)
No API pages are linked for this tag yet. Search apis.io →
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Markets provisional
Kin Score markets whose measured providers carry this tag. Share is the fraction of the market's measured providers that carry it — it describes the market, not this tag.
| Market | Share of the market's providers |
|---|---|
| REITs and Real Estate Securities (SEC REIT registrants, EPRA) | 25% |
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 275 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Fortune 1000, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Governance | 7.3 | 6.5 | +0.8 | 275 |
| Discoverability | 54.4 | 57.9 | -3.5 | 275 |
| Contract Quality | 12.3 | 17.2 | -4.9 | 275 |
| Operational Transparency | 7.3 | 13 | -5.7 | 275 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 14.9 | 23.2 | -8.3 | 275 |
| Access Clarity | 12.5 | 23.9 | -11.4 | 275 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 3% | 13% | -10 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 2% | 12% | -10 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 12% | 11% | +1 |
| Security | 99% | 98% | +1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 2% | 2% | 0 |
| Governance rules | 20% | 16% | +4 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Adobe 76.2
- 2 LinkedIn 74.8
- 3 Dentsply Sirona 67.7
- 4 Autodesk 60.3
- 5 Juniper Networks 58.7
- 6 Intuit 57.7
- 7 Teradata 51.1
- 8 AMERCO 49.5
- 9 Crunchbase 48.4
- 10 AmTrust Financial Services 45.8
- 1 Adobe 65.9
- 2 Crunchbase 46
- 3 Autodesk 43.1
- 4 ADT 42.3
- 5 LinkedIn 41.7
- 6 AmTrust Financial Services 40.2
- 7 Intuit 37.1
- 8 Diebold Nixdorf 36.6
- 9 AOL 36.1
- 10 Juniper Networks 35.4
Coverage caveat. 255 of 275 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 24 October 2026, across 31984 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.