Enterprise Software
Providers using this tag (266)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 7 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 9 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 27 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 38 Limited public surface area
Emerging 69 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 107 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (1)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Emerging 1 Early or largely undocumented
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 202 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Enterprise Software, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 32 | 23.9 | +8.1 | 202 |
| Operational Transparency | 16.5 | 13 | +3.5 | 202 |
| Discoverability | 60.2 | 57.9 | +2.3 | 202 |
| Contract Governance | 8.6 | 6.5 | +2.1 | 202 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 24.3 | 23.2 | +1.1 | 202 |
| Contract Quality | 13.8 | 17.2 | -3.4 | 202 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 16% | 13% | +3 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 15% | 12% | +3 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 15% | 11% | +4 |
| Security | 95% | 98% | -3 |
| Arazzo workflows | 1% | 2% | -1 |
| Governance rules | 9% | 16% | -7 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 OutSystems 75.8
- 2 Anysphere Cursor.com 75.1
- 3 Adobe Workfront 70.4
- 4 Progress Software 69.4
- 5 Oracle Siebel 68.9
- 6 Conga 68.6
- 7 Appian 67.5
- 8 ThoughtSpot 64.8
- 9 LeanKit 62.8
- 10 Inrupt 61
- 1 Adobe Workfront 59.2
- 2 Workera 58.7
- 3 Larridin 54.3
- 4 Informatica 53.5
- 5 Inrupt 49.6
- 6 Conga 48.7
- 7 Crystal Reports 46.2
- 8 Progress Software 45.3
- 9 Pypestream 44.4
- 10 RELEX Solutions 43
Coverage caveat. 189 of 202 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 24 October 2026, across 31984 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.