Enterprise Software
Providers using this tag (289)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 8 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 14 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 29 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 36 Limited public surface area
LayerXMetricStreamModelOpBMC SoftwareWandGrowthSpaceCommvaulto9 SolutionsEmburseCrestaKinaxisCafeX CommunicationsRainFocusChkkITERRUPTIVOOnapsisKosmos AI LabsInsideSales (XANT / InsideSales.com)SimCorp DimensionAibleResultidQlikSpecrightActivelyLemonLimeMasterControlISNSignifyCrystal ReportsAera TechnologyDOTS Technology CorpSummationRallywareVoltaiqCertemyStensul
Emerging 82 Early or largely undocumented
CA Technologies (Broadcom)TresataSAP AmericaToonimoAppFactorIgniteTechMechanical OrchardAvamarMurexSkuidNovellZipappStrategyCerenovusPometryqingflowMursionRiverbed TechnologyLevelpathEchelon AIDragonboatBlackLineScaled CognitionSchrödingerVT EnterpriseEnablonST LabsAccreteConexiomSection AIKlarityArchletIntellectibleOrolabsArria NLGTropeBrandcompeteArtianEnzaiPrysmCO2 AISycamoreHanover ParkCopperleafeMudhraZinierNabooZapata QuantumZendDigiLensSellmoreLeahApiphaniWorkForce SoftwareEudiaServiceMaxBetterUpLightSourceAppifyCopiaTalk-A-BotCollibraScoutbeeIrisVRTopiaConduct AIAssembleLyricWorkhelixAily LabsCognniSyndioAxiamaticRoper TechnologiesFieldpointThorinZmandaHumanQSunyurKyrokMarandAiSensum
Minimal 111 Almost no public developer surface
DatacorCoPlaneAravoTechnologyOneServiceware SEBug LabsLab0BackWebChordiant SoftwareConsonaDecisionPoint SoftwareDWLLikeWiseOrativeVinetiInstalilyDraxonBanyansoftwareBrainO11Ab InitioTiyaroCadcorp LimitedTamrCalypsoFlexspringONEAIX (1data / Yida Technology)BlackSwan TechnologiesEsri UKReiner.aiKingswareLarkNewgen SoftwareWidgera51haohuo.comHigh AlphaSpider CapitalSynapticB&L Information SystemsDoczenKosRepreZenProcuriEdraISSOH Co., Ltd.SunGard Data SystemsFractalAgileSoDAReadSoftMeta4AlyneBroadvisionNovaFabrionQuest SoftwareabcMobBaanTivoliCompusult LimitedHang TeniceonlineRowspaceAPP Group Ness CzechiaPathgatheracorn systemsAelita SoftwareAgile SoftwareConnectCapitalDeploycoKiva SoftwareMetalogixVantusVersantHuon HoldingsBitGravityEsri IndiaOFFAi-BlockchainBeechwood Data SystemsPaceVirageVoloMetrixKanarysClipLineAirwareAlpharelApplimationArbor SoftwareCenterForce TechnologiesCES InternationalCorio, Inc.Cross AccessCubeTreeCullinet SoftwareDigital MarketDigitalkDirig SoftwareFuegoI2 Technologies Inc (THINK SYSTEMS)Identify SoftwareIllustraMCA SolutionsNet Effect SystemsSanta Cruz OperationStorabilitySynQuestSystems CenterUtopia Technology PartnersVirsa SystemsWallDataXELUS
APIs with this tag (1)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Emerging 1 Early or largely undocumented
Score breakdown
Frequency
62.8
log-scaled weighted occurrences
Breadth
3.7
spread across providers
Quality lift
20.7
mean composite of providers using it
Cohesion
5.1
strength of nearest seed neighbor
Related tags
Workflow Automation 22 co-occurrences
ERP 18 co-occurrences
SAP 11 co-occurrences
Acquired 37 co-occurrences
Historical 12 co-occurrences
Supply Chain 29 co-occurrences
Data Management 11 co-occurrences
Procurement 16 co-occurrences
Where this tag comes from
Provider tag289
Api tag1
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 213 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Enterprise Software, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
Providers
213
of 289 in the catalog
Mean Kin Score
25.9
+1.8 vs catalog 24.1
Mean Agent Readiness
11.7
-2.4 vs catalog 14.1
Spread
1.7–78.6
median 20.2 · σ 18.6
How the 213 split by band
Exemplar 8Strong 14Developing 29Thin 33Emerging 76Minimal 53
Facet averages, against the whole catalog
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 36.8 | 30 | +6.8 | 213 |
| Operational Transparency | 16.3 | 13.2 | +3.1 | 213 |
| Discoverability | 61.2 | 59.1 | +2.1 | 213 |
| Contract Governance | 10.7 | 9.7 | +1 | 213 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 25.2 | 24.5 | +0.7 | 213 |
| Contract Quality | 14.5 | 18.6 | -4.1 | 213 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
What this cohort publishes
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 15% | 18% | -3 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 15% | 16% | -1 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 15% | 13% | +2 |
| Security | 95% | 99% | -4 |
| Arazzo workflows | 1% | 1% | 0 |
| Governance rules | 24% | 36% | -12 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
Top by Kin Score
- 1 Progress Software 78.6
- 2 OutSystems 73.6
- 3 Anysphere Cursor.com 73.4
- 4 Conga 72.7
- 5 Appian 70.7
- 6 Adobe Workfront 70.2
- 7 Oracle Siebel 67.3
- 8 ThoughtSpot 67
- 9 Unqork 64.8
- 10 Avaya 64.6
Top by Agent Readiness
- 1 Adobe Workfront 59.2
- 2 Workera 58.7
- 3 Larridin 54.3
- 4 Inrupt 49.6
- 5 Conga 48.7
- 6 Informatica 48
- 7 Progress Software 47
- 8 Pypestream 44.4
- 9 RELEX Solutions 43
- 10 Unqork 42.3
All 289 members of this roster resolve to a provider in the
catalog; 213 carry a score (74%).
The figures above describe the scored members only.
Coverage caveat. 195 of 213 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 14 November 2026, across 41591 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Coverage caveat. 195 of 213 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 14 November 2026, across 41591 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.