Data Management
Data ManagementDataManagement
Providers using this tag (74)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 5 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 17 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 15 Limited public surface area
Emerging 24 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 10 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 3 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (38)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 4 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 6 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 11 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 7 Limited public surface area
Emerging 6 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 4 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (26)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Data Management” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 66 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Data Management, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 36.2 | 23.4 | +12.8 | 66 |
| Access Clarity | 32.9 | 26.5 | +6.4 | 66 |
| Contract Governance | 10.8 | 6.4 | +4.4 | 66 |
| Discoverability | 65.4 | 61.2 | +4.2 | 66 |
| Operational Transparency | 16.3 | 14 | +2.3 | 66 |
| Contract Quality | 21.8 | 19.8 | +2 | 66 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 25% | 10% | +15 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 22% | 13% | +9 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 19% | 11% | +8 |
| Security | 94% | 97% | -3 |
| Arazzo workflows | 4% | 2% | +2 |
| Governance rules | 20% | 14% | +6 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Cohesity 66.1
- 2 Nasuni 61.7
- 3 Microsoft SQL Server 59.6
- 4 Salsify 56.1
- 5 Amazon DataZone 55.9
- 6 Acceldata 53.7
- 7 TileDB 53.3
- 8 SIMBA Chain 52.3
- 9 DataLoop 49.7
- 10 SAP 49.3
- 1 Acceldata 56.3
- 2 Salsify 53.4
- 3 Ryft 42.6
- 4 Cohesity 41.7
- 5 StorONE 41.4
- 6 SIMBA Chain 39.4
- 7 Veeam 38.4
- 8 Amazon FinSpace 37.1
- 9 Nasuni 36.7
- 10 Skyvia 36.4
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.