emerging · 2.1 capability resourceaction

Digital Wallet

Score 22.1 / 100 67 providers +11 via APIs 25 APIs Search apis.io →
Business capabilities this tag reaches
Payments & Card Management 1
Variants seen in the corpus: Digital WalletsE-WalletE-WalletsDigital Wallet

Providers using this tag (67)

Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.

Strong 6 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 14 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 16 Limited public surface area
Emerging 15 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 16 Almost no public developer surface

APIs with this tag (21)

Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →

Strong 2 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 7 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 9 Limited public surface area
Emerging 2 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface

Companies reaching this through an API (11)

These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Digital Wallet” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.

Cielo Cuscal CyberSource GoTo Group (Gojek + Tokopedia) Gr4vy Green Dot Olo Samsung Verifone Wise Worldpay

Score breakdown

Frequency
53.7
log-scaled weighted occurrences
Breadth
1.7
spread across providers
Quality lift
34.6
mean composite of providers using it
Cohesion
8.8
strength of nearest seed neighbor

Where this tag sits

Payments broader

Related tags

Payment Gateway 15 co-occurrences Mobile Payments 8 co-occurrences Tokenization 15 co-occurrences Payouts 16 co-occurrences Disbursements 9 co-occurrences 3D Secure 7 co-occurrences Cross-Border Payments 10 co-occurrences Super App 6 co-occurrences

Where this tag comes from

Provider tag67
Api tag25
Openapi tag1
Openapi op tag4

Cohort brief

Auto-generated

The 65 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Digital Wallet, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.

Providers
65
of 67 in the catalog
Mean Kin Score
28.8
+5.9 vs catalog 22.9
Mean Agent Readiness
16.3
+4.4 vs catalog 11.9
Spread
0–65.4
median 29.8 · σ 17.8
How the 65 split by band
Exemplar 0Strong 6Developing 14Thin 16Emerging 14Minimal 15
Facet averages, against the whole catalog
FacetThis cohortCatalogDifferenceScored
Developer Ergonomics 36.5 23.2 +13.3 65
Operational Transparency 21.1 13.7 +7.4 65
Contract Quality 23.6 17.6 +6 65
Discoverability 62.8 58.1 +4.7 65
Contract Governance 7.6 6.3 +1.3 65
Access Clarity 27.4 26.5 +0.9 65

A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.

What this cohort publishes
ArtifactThis cohortCatalogDifference
MCP server (any) 12% 14% -2
MCP server (first-party) 12% 12% 0
Agent Skills 0% 0% 0
OAuth scopes 15% 11% +4
Security 100% 98% +2
Arazzo workflows 0% 2% -2
Governance rules 8% 14% -6

mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.

Top by Kin Score
  1. 1 DOKU 65.4
  2. 2 PayMongo 65.2
  3. 3 Cash App 58.3
  4. 4 Airtm 57.8
  5. 5 Zai 55.8
  6. 6 NovoPayment 54.9
  7. 7 Coda Payments 53.6
  8. 8 MoonPay 52.6
  9. 9 PPRO 52
  10. 10 Google Pay 49.2
Top by Agent Readiness
  1. 1 Airtm 49.4
  2. 2 PPRO 48.5
  3. 3 LianLian Global 46.7
  4. 4 Visa 46.4
  5. 5 Zai 44.1
  6. 6 Cash App 41.1
  7. 7 Ansa 35.4
  8. 8 Mangopay 33.7
  9. 9 DOKU 33.2
  10. 10 Xfers 33
All 67 members of this roster resolve to a provider in the catalog; 65 carry a score (97%). The figures above describe the scored members only.
Coverage caveat. 54 of 65 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 5 October 2026, across 29093 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.

Work with this as data

Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.

MCP server

One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.

https://apis.io/mcp

Tools for tags

7 MCP tools reach this
  • find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.
  • get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.
  • cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.
  • cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.
  • apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.
  • resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.
  • find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
All 92 tools →

Call it yourself

curl for this page
This tag
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/digital-wallet"
All tags
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
As a scored cohort
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/digital-wallet"
The distribution (Pro)
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/digital-wallet/stats" \
  -H "X-API-Key: $APIS_IO_KEY"

Discovery needs no key. Ratings and market analysis are Pro.

Get an API key

Free tier, no form to fill in. Signing in shares your email address with us — we store it to create your key and to recognise you if you sign in with another provider. See our Privacy Policy and Terms.

A second provider on the same verified email joins the account you already have.