Statistics
Providers using this tag (49)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 2 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 10 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 18 Limited public surface area
Emerging 13 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 6 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (163)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 10 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 16 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 41 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 69 Limited public surface area
Emerging 25 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (117)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Statistics” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Show all 117 companies ↓
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Markets provisional
Kin Score markets whose measured providers carry this tag. Share is the fraction of the market's measured providers that carry it — it describes the market, not this tag.
| Market | Share of the market's providers |
|---|---|
| Football Technology and Sports Data (FIFA Quality Programme) | 21% |
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 47 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Statistics, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 33.2 | 17.2 | +16 | 47 |
| Discoverability | 65.4 | 57.9 | +7.5 | 47 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 30.1 | 23.2 | +6.9 | 47 |
| Operational Transparency | 17.4 | 13 | +4.4 | 47 |
| Contract Governance | 10.7 | 6.5 | +4.2 | 47 |
| Access Clarity | 27.6 | 23.9 | +3.7 | 47 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 13% | 13% | 0 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 15% | 12% | +3 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 2% | 11% | -9 |
| Security | 98% | 98% | 0 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 43% | 16% | +27 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 5DollarFootballAPI 58
- 2 Blubrry API 54.5
- 3 GoatCounter 51.2
- 4 Sportmonks 50.2
- 5 U.S. Department of Transportation 49.5
- 6 US Census Bureau 45.3
- 7 Department of Justice 43.3
- 8 Monitly 42.3
- 9 Economic Research Service 41
- 10 Bureau of Transportation Statistics 40.4
- 1 The Racing API 43.4
- 2 5DollarFootballAPI 43.1
- 3 Invokely 40.7
- 4 Genderize.io 40.3
- 5 Agricultural Statistics Service 33.5
- 6 Blubrry API 32.8
- 7 Bureau of Transportation Statistics 32.6
- 8 U.S. Department of Transportation 30.8
- 9 GoatCounter 28.4
- 10 The Bureau of Economic Analysis 28.4
Coverage caveat. 34 of 47 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 24 October 2026, across 31984 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.