Performance
Providers using this tag (31)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 1 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 9 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Emerging 8 Early or largely undocumented
APIs with this tag (82)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 12 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 10 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 26 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 12 Limited public surface area
Emerging 20 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 2 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (70)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Performance” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Show all 70 companies ↓
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 26 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Performance, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 35.8 | 23.2 | +12.6 | 26 |
| Access Clarity | 36.5 | 26.5 | +10 | 26 |
| Contract Quality | 25.9 | 17.6 | +8.3 | 26 |
| Operational Transparency | 20.9 | 13.7 | +7.2 | 26 |
| Contract Governance | 10.8 | 6.3 | +4.5 | 26 |
| Discoverability | 61.7 | 58.1 | +3.6 | 26 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 31% | 14% | +17 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 31% | 12% | +19 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 19% | 11% | +8 |
| Security | 96% | 98% | -2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 4% | 2% | +2 |
| Governance rules | 31% | 14% | +17 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 New Relic 72.3
- 2 Amazon Global Accelerator 57.8
- 3 WHOOP 53.2
- 4 Factorial 52.8
- 5 APIContext 51.1
- 6 Virtana (Virtual Instruments) 49
- 7 Unravel Data Systems 48.3
- 8 Polar Signals 44.5
- 9 Google Cloud Trace 42.1
- 10 Google Cloud Profiler 41.2
- 1 APIContext 60.1
- 2 Factorial 51
- 3 New Relic 41.2
- 4 Polar Signals 41.2
- 5 Amazon Global Accelerator 37.1
- 6 Virtana (Virtual Instruments) 31.3
- 7 WHOOP 31.2
- 8 CodSpeed 30.9
- 9 Kotzilla 29.9
- 10 Sage HR 26.5
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.