Community
CommunitiesCommunity
Providers using this tag (228)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 3 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 7 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 15 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 36 Limited public surface area
Emerging 69 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 97 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 1 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (78)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 10 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 12 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 25 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 19 Limited public surface area
Emerging 11 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (53)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Community” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Show all 53 companies ↓
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Markets provisional
Kin Score markets whose measured providers carry this tag. Share is the fraction of the market's measured providers that carry it — it describes the market, not this tag.
| Market | Share of the market's providers |
|---|---|
| Discourse Plugin Ecosystem | 44% |
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 212 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Community, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Governance | 5.9 | 6.5 | -0.6 | 212 |
| Operational Transparency | 10.5 | 13 | -2.5 | 212 |
| Access Clarity | 21.3 | 23.9 | -2.6 | 212 |
| Discoverability | 54.7 | 57.9 | -3.2 | 212 |
| Contract Quality | 13.7 | 17.2 | -3.5 | 212 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 18.4 | 23.2 | -4.8 | 212 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 9% | 13% | -4 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 8% | 12% | -4 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 10% | 11% | -1 |
| Security | 99% | 98% | +1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 1% | 2% | -1 |
| Governance rules | 19% | 16% | +3 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Gainsight 82.4
- 2 The Colony 74.8
- 3 Khoros 70.4
- 4 Common Room 65.7
- 5 Commune 64.2
- 6 Vanilla Forums 58
- 7 Crowd.dev 56.4
- 8 GZW Data API 56
- 9 Bettermode 55.5
- 10 FindLocal 55.1
- 1 The Colony 65.4
- 2 Common Room 64.1
- 3 Commune 61.6
- 4 Piknik.Spot 56.7
- 5 Luma 45.9
- 6 PrompTessor 43.9
- 7 Nextdoor 43.9
- 8 Gainsight 41.5
- 9 Khoros 37.5
- 10 FindLocal 37.5
Coverage caveat. 190 of 212 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 24 October 2026, across 31984 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.