Social
Socialsocial
Providers using this tag (176)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Developing 13 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 15 Limited public surface area
Emerging 28 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 90 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (77)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 5 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 13 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 17 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 19 Limited public surface area
Emerging 5 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 17 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (34)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Social” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 137 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Social, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Governance | 3.1 | 6.4 | -3.3 | 137 |
| Discoverability | 57.6 | 61.2 | -3.6 | 137 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 18.1 | 23.4 | -5.3 | 137 |
| Access Clarity | 21.1 | 26.5 | -5.4 | 137 |
| Operational Transparency | 8 | 14 | -6 | 137 |
| Contract Quality | 13.3 | 19.8 | -6.5 | 137 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 6% | 10% | -4 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 8% | 13% | -5 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 9% | 11% | -2 |
| Security | 89% | 97% | -8 |
| Arazzo workflows | 2% | 2% | 0 |
| Governance rules | 9% | 14% | -5 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 X 68.5
- 2 Giphy 59.5
- 3 Linden Lab 59.1
- 4 Twitter/X 59.1
- 5 Meta 56.7
- 6 Youtube 56.6
- 7 Trakt 56.4
- 8 Imgur 56.1
- 9 Sylvia API 54.1
- 10 CryptoCompare 52.2
- 1 X 61.8
- 2 CryptoCompare 60.2
- 3 Sylvia API 55.6
- 4 Twitter/X 48.5
- 5 Neynar 40.6
- 6 Youtube 38.8
- 7 Meta 35.6
- 8 AniList 35.3
- 9 Nextdoor 33.5
- 10 Gravatar 33.1
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.