Social Network
Social NetworksSocial NetworkingSocial Network
Providers using this tag (62)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 2 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 5 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 8 Limited public surface area
Emerging 13 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 34 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (5)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Strong 1 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 1 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 3 Limited public surface area
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 52 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Social Network, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operational Transparency | 12 | 13.7 | -1.7 | 52 |
| Contract Governance | 4.4 | 6.3 | -1.9 | 52 |
| Contract Quality | 13.7 | 17.6 | -3.9 | 52 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 18.4 | 23.2 | -4.8 | 52 |
| Discoverability | 52 | 58.1 | -6.1 | 52 |
| Access Clarity | 20.3 | 26.5 | -6.2 | 52 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 8% | 14% | -6 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 8% | 12% | -4 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 10% | 11% | -1 |
| Security | 100% | 98% | +2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 2% | 2% | 0 |
| Governance rules | 13% | 14% | -1 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 The Colony 63.8
- 2 Dant3 61.2
- 3 Misskey 51
- 4 ClawdChat 虾聊 46.8
- 5 AT Protocol 45
- 6 Bluesky 44.8
- 7 Diaspora 42.2
- 8 Lemmy 41.8
- 9 Facebook 41.3
- 10 Threads 40.6
- 1 The Colony 67.8
- 2 ClawdChat 虾聊 54.5
- 3 Dant3 33.3
- 4 Misskey 32.3
- 5 Threads 28.7
- 6 Facebook 27.7
- 7 Diaspora 27.2
- 8 Bluesky 25.9
- 9 Microsoft Yammer 24.8
- 10 AT Protocol 23.7
Coverage caveat. 45 of 52 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 5 October 2026, across 29093 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.