Mobile App
Mobile AppsMobile ApplicationsMobile ApplicationMobile App
Providers using this tag (325)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 3 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Emerging 100 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 215 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 1 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (13)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 3 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 5 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 1 Limited public surface area
Emerging 2 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (10)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Mobile App” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 280 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Mobile App, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Governance | 1.3 | 6.3 | -5 | 280 |
| Access Clarity | 20.5 | 26.5 | -6 | 280 |
| Discoverability | 50.4 | 58.1 | -7.7 | 280 |
| Operational Transparency | 2.8 | 13.7 | -10.9 | 280 |
| Contract Quality | 1.3 | 17.6 | -16.3 | 280 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 6.7 | 23.2 | -16.5 | 280 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 4% | 14% | -10 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 2% | 12% | -10 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 2% | 11% | -9 |
| Security | 98% | 98% | 0 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 1% | 14% | -13 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Google AdMob 63
- 2 AppstoreSpy 58.4
- 3 MixRank 57.7
- 4 Tapcart 51.9
- 5 Flipdish 49.9
- 6 Shorebird 34.1
- 7 Venn 29.7
- 8 Blynk 27.4
- 9 Jerry 26.8
- 10 Meow Wolf 25.9
- 1 Flipdish 43.8
- 2 Google AdMob 34.7
- 3 AppstoreSpy 32.4
- 4 Tapcart 27.6
- 5 MixRank 27
- 6 Venn 25.7
- 7 ianacare 20.5
- 8 Meow Wolf 17.6
- 9 Audigo Labs 13.8
- 10 Beeline 13.8
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.