Membership
MembershipsMembership
Providers using this tag (91)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 2 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 11 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 16 Limited public surface area
Emerging 36 Early or largely undocumented
APIs with this tag (86)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 8 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 11 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 22 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 28 Limited public surface area
Emerging 13 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 4 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (57)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Membership” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Show all 57 companies ↓
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 89 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Membership, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 32.8 | 26.5 | +6.3 | 89 |
| Discoverability | 58.4 | 58.1 | +0.3 | 89 |
| Operational Transparency | 12.3 | 13.7 | -1.4 | 89 |
| Contract Governance | 4.7 | 6.3 | -1.6 | 89 |
| Contract Quality | 15.8 | 17.6 | -1.8 | 89 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 19.3 | 23.2 | -3.9 | 89 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 12% | 14% | -2 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 10% | 12% | -2 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 15% | 11% | +4 |
| Security | 100% | 98% | +2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 10% | 14% | -4 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Ghost 78
- 2 Antavo 66.9
- 3 Kartra 58.6
- 4 ServiceTitan 53.6
- 5 Hang 53.3
- 6 SendOwl 53.2
- 7 Cobot 51.7
- 8 Teachable 49.7
- 9 MemberPress 46.4
- 10 Unlock Protocol 45.9
- 1 Cobot 58
- 2 Kajabi 52.1
- 3 Whop 47.4
- 4 Fourthwall 44.6
- 5 Blackbird 40.4
- 6 MemberPress 34.1
- 7 Antavo 34
- 8 EZR 31.7
- 9 Ghost 30.8
- 10 Mighty Networks 29.8
Coverage caveat. 73 of 89 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 5 October 2026, across 29093 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.