Sites
Sitessites
Providers using this tag (94)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 5 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 22 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 36 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 25 Limited public surface area
Emerging 6 Early or largely undocumented
APIs with this tag (100)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 5 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 27 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 37 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 25 Limited public surface area
Emerging 6 Early or largely undocumented
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 94 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Sites, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 54.5 | 17.5 | +37 | 94 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 44.8 | 17.9 | +26.9 | 94 |
| Operational Transparency | 32.5 | 11.3 | +21.2 | 94 |
| Access Clarity | 42.1 | 22.3 | +19.8 | 94 |
| Contract Governance | 18.7 | 6.4 | +12.3 | 94 |
| Discoverability | 72.2 | 60.4 | +11.8 | 94 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 50% | 16% | +34 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 14% | 7% | +7 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 33% | 9% | +24 |
| Security | 98% | 88% | +10 |
| Arazzo workflows | 11% | 2% | +9 |
| Governance rules | 41% | 13% | +28 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Salesforce 83.3
- 2 Optimizely 75.1
- 3 Square 71.8
- 4 8x8 67.1
- 5 Google Search Console 67.1
- 6 Palo Alto Networks 63.7
- 7 Plausible 62.9
- 8 Laravel 62.5
- 9 GitHub 62.4
- 10 KPN 61.9
- 1 Automattic 62.3
- 2 Salesforce 52.2
- 3 Facilio 50.2
- 4 ZippyKid 48.2
- 5 Mireye 47.8
- 6 GitHub 45.5
- 7 Webflow 45.5
- 8 Square 44.3
- 9 8x8 43.3
- 10 Laravel 41.2
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.
MCP server
One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.
https://apis.io/mcp
Tools for tags
7 MCP tools reach this
find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
Call it yourself
curl for this page
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/sites"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/sites"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/sites/stats" \
-H "X-API-Key: $APIS_IO_KEY"
Discovery needs no key. Ratings and market analysis are Pro.