Crypto
Providers using this tag (283)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 3 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 11 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 58 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 69 Limited public surface area
Emerging 53 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 88 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 1 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (39)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 2 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 3 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 16 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 12 Limited public surface area
Emerging 6 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (19)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Crypto” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 271 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Crypto, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 34.9 | 23.2 | +11.7 | 271 |
| Contract Quality | 23.4 | 17.6 | +5.8 | 271 |
| Operational Transparency | 18.8 | 13.7 | +5.1 | 271 |
| Discoverability | 61.9 | 58.1 | +3.8 | 271 |
| Contract Governance | 6.3 | 6.3 | 0 | 271 |
| Access Clarity | 22.3 | 26.5 | -4.2 | 271 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 19% | 14% | +5 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 18% | 12% | +6 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 7% | 11% | -4 |
| Security | 99% | 98% | +1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 3% | 2% | +1 |
| Governance rules | 10% | 14% | -4 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Massive (formerly Polygon.io) 75.8
- 2 0xArchive 71.6
- 3 Twelve Data 69
- 4 Didit 62
- 5 FarmDash Agent Hub 61.3
- 6 Covalent 60.9
- 7 Adanos Market Sentiment API 59.7
- 8 Chainstack 59.6
- 9 x402 List API 58.4
- 10 Ripio 58.2
- 1 0xArchive 66.9
- 2 Twelve Data 62
- 3 Didit 59.8
- 4 Lukka 55
- 5 Alpaca 54.2
- 6 Alpha Vantage 51.4
- 7 DefiLlama 49.5
- 8 N3XT 49.4
- 9 SnowSignals 49.3
- 10 Anchorage Digital 47.5
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.