Crypto
Cryptocrypto
Providers using this tag (278)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 3 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 17 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 53 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 66 Limited public surface area
Emerging 53 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 78 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 8 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (42)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 2 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 9 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 12 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 13 Limited public surface area
Emerging 6 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (17)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Crypto” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 261 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Crypto, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 35.4 | 23.4 | +12 | 261 |
| Contract Quality | 25.6 | 19.8 | +5.8 | 261 |
| Operational Transparency | 19.6 | 14 | +5.6 | 261 |
| Discoverability | 65.5 | 61.2 | +4.3 | 261 |
| Contract Governance | 6.1 | 6.4 | -0.3 | 261 |
| Access Clarity | 22.3 | 26.5 | -4.2 | 261 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 16% | 10% | +6 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 19% | 13% | +6 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 7% | 11% | -4 |
| Security | 98% | 97% | +1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 3% | 2% | +1 |
| Governance rules | 10% | 14% | -4 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Twelve Data 73.3
- 2 0xArchive 72.7
- 3 Polygon 68.3
- 4 Covalent 62.2
- 5 Ripio 62
- 6 Didit 59.8
- 7 Alpaca 59.7
- 8 Chainstack 59.5
- 9 MyStars FaaS 59.2
- 10 Coinflow 58.7
- 1 Polygon 63.1
- 2 Alpha Vantage 61.9
- 3 Twelve Data 58.4
- 4 Didit 58.4
- 5 Alpaca 58.2
- 6 0xArchive 57.7
- 7 Lukka 57.2
- 8 SnowSignals 51.6
- 9 Anchorage Digital 47.5
- 10 Orthogonal 45.8
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.