Customer Feedback
Providers using this tag (32)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 2 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 11 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 12 Limited public surface area
Emerging 4 Early or largely undocumented
Unrated 1 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (9)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Strong 3 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 2 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 4 Limited public surface area
Companies reaching this through an API (2)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Customer Feedback” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 31 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Customer Feedback, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 42.1 | 26.5 | +15.6 | 31 |
| Contract Quality | 33.2 | 20.1 | +13.1 | 31 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 34.8 | 23.4 | +11.4 | 31 |
| Operational Transparency | 22.9 | 14 | +8.9 | 31 |
| Discoverability | 69.6 | 61 | +8.6 | 31 |
| Contract Governance | 8.9 | 6.5 | +2.4 | 31 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 25% | 10% | +15 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 38% | 13% | +25 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 19% | 11% | +8 |
| Security | 97% | 96% | +1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 3% | 2% | +1 |
| Governance rules | 9% | 13% | -4 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 ClosedLoop AI 61
- 2 ReviewTrackers 55.4
- 3 Evermuse 50.2
- 4 Gleap 49
- 5 Clozd 48.3
- 6 Pendo.io 47
- 7 Survicate 46.5
- 8 SiteJabber 44.1
- 9 Syncly 44.1
- 10 HappyOrNot 43.4
- 1 ClosedLoop AI 74.6
- 2 Clozd 59.5
- 3 Evermuse 54.9
- 4 Syncly 50
- 5 Survicate 44.6
- 6 Productboard 40.3
- 7 Revinate 39.8
- 8 Unwrap 36.9
- 9 Pendo.io 36.2
- 10 Dovetail 32.7
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.