Contact
Contactcontact
Providers using this tag (44)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 4 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 12 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 17 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 9 Limited public surface area
Emerging 2 Early or largely undocumented
APIs with this tag (44)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 4 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 12 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 17 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 9 Limited public surface area
Emerging 2 Early or largely undocumented
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 44 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Contact, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 57.8 | 17.5 | +40.3 | 44 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 50.7 | 17.9 | +32.8 | 44 |
| Access Clarity | 48 | 22.3 | +25.7 | 44 |
| Operational Transparency | 30.7 | 11.3 | +19.4 | 44 |
| Contract Governance | 24 | 6.4 | +17.6 | 44 |
| Discoverability | 74.7 | 60.4 | +14.3 | 44 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 64% | 16% | +48 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 39% | 7% | +32 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 30% | 9% | +21 |
| Security | 98% | 88% | +10 |
| Arazzo workflows | 7% | 2% | +5 |
| Governance rules | 39% | 13% | +26 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Listrak 77.4
- 2 Birdeye 72.8
- 3 Leadping 72.2
- 4 API Evangelist 69.8
- 5 Keap 66.4
- 6 Factset 64.8
- 7 ServiceNow 64.8
- 8 Slash 63.7
- 9 Clari 60.9
- 10 SendHub 60.7
- 1 Birdeye 61
- 2 Chariot 55.8
- 3 Factset 52.8
- 4 Slash 47.2
- 5 Cobot 46.9
- 6 API Evangelist 44.8
- 7 Hubflo 44.4
- 8 Alasco 43.6
- 9 Wise 42.4
- 10 RevenueBase 40.1
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.
MCP server
One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.
https://apis.io/mcp
Tools for tags
7 MCP tools reach this
find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
Call it yourself
curl for this page
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/contact"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/contact"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/contact/stats" \
-H "X-API-Key: $APIS_IO_KEY"
Discovery needs no key. Ratings and market analysis are Pro.