BOND
BOND is a San Francisco-based growth-stage venture capital firm founded in 2018 by Mary Meeker, Mood Rowghani, Noah Knauf, and Juliet de Baubigny as a spinout of the Kleiner Perkins Digital Growth Fund. BOND backs proven, high-growth internet and software companies that have already established product-market fit, helping them scale globally toward IPO readiness. The firm invests primarily at the late/growth stage (roughly Series C and beyond) and is known for Mary Meeker's influential multi-hundred-page Internet Trends and AI Trends reports. Sectors span artificial intelligence, developer tools and infrastructure, fintech, health and biotech, consumer and marketplaces, and frontier hardware. BOND has raised three funds - $1.25B (2019), $2B (2021), and $2.5B (2022) - and its portfolio and track record include Canva, OpenAI, Stripe, Postman, Netlify, Revolut, Ironclad, Applied Intuition, DoorDash, Duolingo, and Uber.
BOND has 120 portfolio companies tracked on the APIs.io network, of which 66 (55%) publish APIs indexed here. The remaining 54 are tracked as profiles without a published API on the network.
Its highest-rated API providers on the network are Openai, Stripe, Plaid, Postman, Doordash.
Portfolio on the Network
Portfolio companies that publish APIs indexed on APIs.io, grouped by their API Evangelist rating. Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 13 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Developing 23 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 14 Limited public surface area
Minimal 2 Almost no public developer surface
Properties
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 107 portfolio companies with APIs in the catalog, backed by BOND, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operational Transparency | 23 | 13.6 | +9.4 | 107 |
| Contract Quality | 26.7 | 17.6 | +9.1 | 107 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 30.9 | 23.1 | +7.8 | 107 |
| Access Clarity | 34.1 | 26.4 | +7.7 | 107 |
| Discoverability | 62.3 | 58.2 | +4.1 | 107 |
| Contract Governance | 8 | 6.3 | +1.7 | 107 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 29% | 15% | +14 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 24% | 12% | +12 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 22% | 11% | +11 |
| Security | 100% | 98% | +2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 9% | 2% | +7 |
| Governance rules | 26% | 13% | +13 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
Coverage caveat. 82 of 107 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 3 October 2026, across 28834 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Source (apis.yml)
Work with this as data
Every firm here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.