Quoting
Quotingquoting
Providers using this tag (44)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 4 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 11 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 7 Limited public surface area
Emerging 15 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 7 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (25)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Strong 3 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 6 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 3 Limited public surface area
Emerging 11 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 2 Almost no public developer surface
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 44 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Quoting, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 33.2 | 22.3 | +10.9 | 44 |
| Contract Quality | 28.2 | 17.5 | +10.7 | 44 |
| Operational Transparency | 19.2 | 11.3 | +7.9 | 44 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 25.7 | 17.9 | +7.8 | 44 |
| Discoverability | 67.3 | 60.4 | +6.9 | 44 |
| Contract Governance | 10.8 | 6.4 | +4.4 | 44 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 18% | 16% | +2 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 5% | 7% | -2 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 9% | 9% | 0 |
| Security | 95% | 88% | +7 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 14% | 13% | +1 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Sendle 59.9
- 2 1Fort 57.6
- 3 Telia Company 55.2
- 4 D-Tools 54.6
- 5 APOLLO Insurance 52.9
- 6 Jobber 52.1
- 7 Phasio 52
- 8 AT&T 50.9
- 9 Evari 50.1
- 10 Buildxact 47.6
- 1 HealthSherpa 48.9
- 2 Telia Company 48.1
- 3 Phasio 43.7
- 4 AT&T 37.3
- 5 1Fort 33.9
- 6 Pax8 33.6
- 7 DSV 32.3
- 8 APOLLO Insurance 30.4
- 9 D-Tools 29
- 10 Pie Insurance 28.1
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.
MCP server
One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.
https://apis.io/mcp
Tools for tags
7 MCP tools reach this
find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
Call it yourself
curl for this page
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/quoting"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/quoting"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/quoting/stats" \
-H "X-API-Key: $APIS_IO_KEY"
Discovery needs no key. Ratings and market analysis are Pro.