niche · -1.1 market industry

Quoting

Score 17.5 / 100 33 providers +15 via APIs 20 APIs Search apis.io →
Business capabilities this tag reaches
Procurement Management 1 Insurance Distribution Management 1

Providers using this tag (33)

Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.

Strong 5 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 6 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 3 Limited public surface area
Emerging 14 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 5 Almost no public developer surface

APIs with this tag (20)

Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →

Strong 2 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 4 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 4 Limited public surface area
Emerging 7 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 3 Almost no public developer surface

Companies reaching this through an API (15)

These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Quoting” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.

AT&T BT Group Certinia Cover Whale CoverWallet Echo Global Logistics eHealth Guardian Life PartsTech Sendle Shipwell Telia Company Travelers Uber Freight Vertafore

Score breakdown

Frequency
43.8
log-scaled weighted occurrences
Breadth
0.4
spread across providers
Quality lift
29.6
mean composite of providers using it
Cohesion
3.2
strength of nearest seed neighbor

Related tags

Commercial Insurance 7 co-occurrences Bindings 5 co-occurrences Insurtech 18 co-occurrences Property and Casualty 7 co-occurrences Quotes 14 co-occurrences Carrier 6 co-occurrences Brokerage 7 co-occurrences Insurance 22 co-occurrences

Where this tag comes from

Provider tag33
Api tag20
Openapi tag2
Openapi op tag4

Cohort brief

Auto-generated

The 29 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Quoting, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.

Providers
29
of 33 in the catalog
Mean Kin Score
32
+7.9 vs catalog 24.1
Mean Agent Readiness
18.5
+4.4 vs catalog 14.1
Spread
2.6–66.3
median 25.1 · σ 18.6
How the 29 split by band
Exemplar 0Strong 5Developing 6Thin 3Emerging 12Minimal 3
Facet averages, against the whole catalog
FacetThis cohortCatalogDifferenceScored
Contract Quality 31 18.6 +12.4 29
Access Clarity 37.8 30 +7.8 29
Contract Governance 15.2 9.7 +5.5 29
Developer Ergonomics 29.2 24.5 +4.7 29
Discoverability 63.5 59.1 +4.4 29
Operational Transparency 16.4 13.2 +3.2 29

A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.

What this cohort publishes
ArtifactThis cohortCatalogDifference
MCP server (any) 14% 18% -4
MCP server (first-party) 17% 16% +1
Agent Skills 0% 0% 0
OAuth scopes 3% 13% -10
Security 100% 99% +1
Arazzo workflows 0% 1% -1
Governance rules 55% 36% +19

mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.

Top by Kin Score
  1. 1 1Fort 66.3
  2. 2 Phasio 60.1
  3. 3 Paperless Parts 57.4
  4. 4 D-Tools 57
  5. 5 APOLLO Insurance 56.7
  6. 6 Jobber 51.5
  7. 7 Evari 51.4
  8. 8 Fulcrumpro 50.8
  9. 9 Buildxact 48.9
  10. 10 Pax8 48.2
Top by Agent Readiness
  1. 1 Phasio 53.2
  2. 2 HealthSherpa 47.9
  3. 3 Jobber 45.3
  4. 4 Pax8 37.2
  5. 5 Paperless Parts 36.9
  6. 6 1Fort 31.6
  7. 7 Pie Insurance 29.6
  8. 8 D-Tools 29.4
  9. 9 Semsee 25.8
  10. 10 Fulcrumpro 25.3
All 33 members of this roster resolve to a provider in the catalog; 29 carry a score (88%). The figures above describe the scored members only.
Coverage caveat. 23 of 29 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 14 November 2026, across 41591 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.

Work with this as data

Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.

MCP server

One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.

https://apis.io/mcp

Tools for tags

7 MCP tools reach this
  • find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.
  • get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.
  • cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.
  • cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.
  • apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.
  • resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.
  • find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
All 92 tools →

Call it yourself

curl for this page
This tag
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/quoting"
All tags
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
As a scored cohort (paid plan)
The distribution (Pro)

Calls without X-API-Key need no key. Calls with it need a paid plan — get a key.

Get an API key

Free tier, no form to fill in. Signing in shares your email address with us — we store it to create your key and to recognise you if you sign in with another provider. See our Privacy Policy and Terms.

A second provider on the same verified email joins the account you already have.