Quoting
Providers using this tag (29)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Developing 7 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 3 Limited public surface area
Emerging 12 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 4 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (19)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Developing 5 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
PartsTech Quoting APIQuotingEvari Quotes APIThe Evari Quotes microservice - the internal broker and underwriter quoting surface at /api/quotes/** plus ...Telia LSO Sonata Quote Management APIManages quote request and completion between seller and buyer for Telia operator customers and selected B2O...AT&T Alliance Wireline APIsWireline business APIs enabling partners to expedite quoting, service qualification, and ordering of AT&T w...Sendle Products & Quoting APIGet one quote per shipping product for a given route. GET /products handles domestic and DAP international;...
Thin 3 Limited public surface area
Travelers Quoting APICommercial insurance quoting and policy pricingEchoSync Customer APIShipper-facing REST API providing rapid access to competitive truckload quotes and rates 24/7/365, load cre...Pie Insurance Partner APIREST API for approved partners to access Pie Insurance workers compensation quoting and binding workflows. ...
Emerging 8 Early or largely undocumented
Ladder APIThe Ladder API is an embedded term-life-insurance distribution surface for partner platforms. It is deliver...Commercial Auto Quoting APIQuoting product for commercial auto policies; enables partners to surface Progressive commercial-lines cove...Embedded Direct Quoting APIReturns an estimated auto insurance rate from consumer-supplied vehicle and driver data; partners embed the...Shipwell Quoting APIRates, quotes, RFQs, spot negotiations, and carrier bids. (modeled)Group Rating & Quoting APISecure, real-time access to request and retrieve a quote for Guardian products. The technology partner requ...Uber Freight Loads APICore REST API for generating price quotes for truckload shipments, tendering loads to Uber Freight's carrie...CoverWallet Insurance APIREST API for quoting and binding small business commercial insurance policies across multiple carriers incl...Certinia Services CPQ APICertinia Services CPQ Apex API for configuring, pricing, and quoting services engagements and estimates tha...
Minimal 3 Almost no public developer surface
Vertafore PL Rating APIA rating and quoting API surface over PL Rating, Vertafore's personal-lines comparative rater connected to ...Quote Management (Ethernet)Create and retrieve quotes for BT Wholesale Ethernet and Optical connectivity products as part of B2B order...eHealth APIeHealth's partner-facing developer API for embedding health-insurance shopping, quoting, and enrollment. Ac...
Companies reaching this through an API (14)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Quoting” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
AT&T
BT Group
Certinia
CoverWallet
Echo Global Logistics
eHealth
Guardian Life
PartsTech
Sendle
Shipwell
Telia Company
Travelers
Uber Freight
Vertafore
Score breakdown
Frequency
45.3
log-scaled weighted occurrences
Breadth
0.7
spread across providers
Quality lift
31.7
mean composite of providers using it
Cohesion
3.3
strength of nearest seed neighbor
Related tags
Commercial Insurance 7 co-occurrences
Quotes 14 co-occurrences
Insurtech 17 co-occurrences
Property and Casualty 7 co-occurrences
Carrier 6 co-occurrences
Brokerage 7 co-occurrences
Insurance 21 co-occurrences
Policies 5 co-occurrences
Where this tag comes from
Provider tag29
Api tag19
Openapi tag2
Openapi op tag4
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 28 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Quoting, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
Providers
28
of 29 in the catalog
Mean Kin Score
31.2
+9.0 vs catalog 22.2
Mean Agent Readiness
18.1
+6.1 vs catalog 12
Spread
3.1–64.5
median 24.5 · σ 17.7
How the 28 split by band
Exemplar 0Strong 3Developing 7Thin 3Emerging 12Minimal 3
Facet averages, against the whole catalog
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 31.8 | 17.2 | +14.6 | 28 |
| Access Clarity | 33.4 | 23.9 | +9.5 | 28 |
| Discoverability | 64.1 | 57.9 | +6.2 | 28 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 28.7 | 23.2 | +5.5 | 28 |
| Operational Transparency | 17 | 13 | +4 | 28 |
| Contract Governance | 9.4 | 6.5 | +2.9 | 28 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
What this cohort publishes
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 14% | 13% | +1 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 14% | 12% | +2 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 4% | 11% | -7 |
| Security | 100% | 98% | +2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 11% | 16% | -5 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
Top by Kin Score
- 1 1Fort 64.5
- 2 Phasio 58.1
- 3 D-Tools 54.5
- 4 Paperless Parts 54.1
- 5 APOLLO Insurance 52.4
- 6 Jobber 50.4
- 7 Fulcrumpro 49.3
- 8 Pax8 48.1
- 9 Evari 47.6
- 10 Buildxact 47.3
Top by Agent Readiness
- 1 HealthSherpa 47.9
- 2 Jobber 45.3
- 3 Phasio 45
- 4 Pax8 37.2
- 5 Paperless Parts 36.9
- 6 1Fort 31.6
- 7 Pie Insurance 29.6
- 8 D-Tools 29.4
- 9 Semsee 25.8
- 10 Fulcrumpro 25.3
All 29 members of this roster resolve to a provider in the
catalog; 28 carry a score (97%).
The figures above describe the scored members only.
Coverage caveat. 25 of 28 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 24 October 2026, across 31984 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Coverage caveat. 25 of 28 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 24 October 2026, across 31984 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.