Partner Gated
Providers using this tag (52)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Developing 3 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 11 Limited public surface area
Emerging 29 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 9 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (30)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Developing 3 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 8 Limited public surface area
Emerging 16 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 3 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (5)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Partner Gated” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 52 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Partner Gated, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Governance | 9.6 | 6.5 | +3.1 | 52 |
| Discoverability | 63.7 | 61 | +2.7 | 52 |
| Access Clarity | 26.9 | 26.5 | +0.4 | 52 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 19.6 | 23.4 | -3.8 | 52 |
| Operational Transparency | 10.1 | 14 | -3.9 | 52 |
| Contract Quality | 5.5 | 20.1 | -14.6 | 52 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 0% | 10% | -10 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 0% | 13% | -13 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 25% | 11% | +14 |
| Security | 100% | 96% | +4 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 0% | 13% | -13 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 TPG Telecom 51.3
- 2 Tata Communications 48.3
- 3 Great-West Lifeco 43.4
- 4 ezyVet 37.3
- 5 LexisNexis Risk Solutions 37.1
- 6 PSC Insurance 36.9
- 7 Codafication 35.7
- 8 CCC Intelligent Solutions 33.8
- 9 Steadfast Group 32.6
- 10 Bupa 31.7
- 1 Steadfast Group 44.8
- 2 Tata Communications 29.5
- 3 PSC Insurance 29.1
- 4 TPG Telecom 26.1
- 5 Codafication 22.7
- 6 ezyVet 22.3
- 7 CAA Insurance 22.3
- 8 Send Technology 18.7
- 9 CCC Intelligent Solutions 18
- 10 Vitality 18
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.