Providers using this tag (75)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 2 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 9 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 19 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 37 Limited public surface area
Emerging 8 Early or largely undocumented
APIs with this tag (73)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 3 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 9 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 16 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 37 Limited public surface area
Emerging 8 Early or largely undocumented
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 75 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Info, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 52.7 | 17.5 | +35.2 | 75 |
| Operational Transparency | 27.3 | 11.3 | +16 | 75 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 31.4 | 17.9 | +13.5 | 75 |
| Discoverability | 71.2 | 60.4 | +10.8 | 75 |
| Contract Governance | 15.9 | 6.4 | +9.5 | 75 |
| Access Clarity | 31.7 | 22.3 | +9.4 | 75 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 28% | 16% | +12 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 9% | 7% | +2 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 21% | 9% | +12 |
| Security | 100% | 88% | +12 |
| Arazzo workflows | 7% | 2% | +5 |
| Governance rules | 65% | 13% | +52 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Salesforce 83.3
- 2 8x8 67.1
- 3 Daytona 65.2
- 4 Factset 64.8
- 5 Slack 62.3
- 6 Covalent 60.4
- 7 Roboflow 57.8
- 8 Suki AI 56.3
- 9 Lighter 55.9
- 10 Malwarebytes 55.3
- 1 Roboflow 54
- 2 Factset 52.8
- 3 Salesforce 52.2
- 4 Kurrent 45.5
- 5 8x8 43.3
- 6 Atlassian 41.9
- 7 Google 39.2
- 8 Neynar 38.8
- 9 Hugging Face 37.6
- 10 Interhyp 32.9
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.
MCP server
One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.
https://apis.io/mcp
Tools for tags
7 MCP tools reach this
find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
Call it yourself
curl for this page
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/info"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/info"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/info/stats" \
-H "X-API-Key: $APIS_IO_KEY"
Discovery needs no key. Ratings and market analysis are Pro.