Android
Providers using this tag (30)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Developing 6 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 5 Limited public surface area
Minimal 11 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (69)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 6 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 6 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 23 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 24 Limited public surface area
Emerging 9 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (55)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Android” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 25 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Android, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 29 | 23.4 | +5.6 | 25 |
| Contract Quality | 21.1 | 19.8 | +1.3 | 25 |
| Discoverability | 61.8 | 61.2 | +0.6 | 25 |
| Operational Transparency | 14.2 | 14 | +0.2 | 25 |
| Contract Governance | 5.7 | 6.4 | -0.7 | 25 |
| Access Clarity | 22.6 | 26.5 | -3.9 | 25 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 11% | 10% | +1 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 11% | 13% | -2 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 26% | 11% | +15 |
| Security | 85% | 97% | -12 |
| Arazzo workflows | 7% | 2% | +5 |
| Governance rules | 19% | 14% | +5 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Android 49.8
- 2 Bluestacks 48.8
- 3 Esper 47
- 4 Google Android 44.8
- 5 Emerge Tools 44.7
- 6 Memfault 42.1
- 7 Limrun 38.4
- 8 Google Play Console Developer Reporting 37.1
- 9 Appium 36.7
- 10 Kotzilla 32.9
- 1 Android 43.9
- 2 Limrun 43
- 3 Google Android 33.5
- 4 Appium 29.4
- 5 Google Play Console Developer Reporting 28.7
- 6 Google Play Developer 24.8
- 7 Esper 23.2
- 8 Bluestacks 22.7
- 9 Emerge Tools 21.8
- 10 Memfault 19.8
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.