Mobile SDK
Providers using this tag (30)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 5 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 6 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 8 Limited public surface area
Emerging 8 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 2 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (14)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Developing 8 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 5 Limited public surface area
Companies reaching this through an API (9)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Mobile SDK” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 30 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Mobile SDK, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 52.7 | 23.3 | +29.4 | 30 |
| Operational Transparency | 30.9 | 13.9 | +17 | 30 |
| Access Clarity | 38.8 | 26.3 | +12.5 | 30 |
| Discoverability | 68.7 | 61 | +7.7 | 30 |
| Contract Quality | 24.4 | 19.8 | +4.6 | 30 |
| Contract Governance | 10.9 | 6.3 | +4.6 | 30 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 20% | 10% | +10 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 27% | 9% | +18 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 13% | 11% | +2 |
| Security | 97% | 97% | 0 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 3% | 14% | -11 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 MoEngage 71.5
- 2 AppsFlyer 65.6
- 3 HyperTrack 59.4
- 4 AppLike Group 58.7
- 5 MetaMap 56.2
- 6 Sourcepoint 54.9
- 7 Movable Ink 48.6
- 8 Truecaller 46.6
- 9 Paedae 46
- 10 Opera 45.2
- 1 MoEngage 62.6
- 2 AppsFlyer 47.9
- 3 HyperTrack 42.6
- 4 Paedae 42.3
- 5 AppLike Group 34.7
- 6 Sourcepoint 32.9
- 7 MetaMap 32
- 8 Truecaller 30.9
- 9 LEEO Insurance Services 30.2
- 10 Opera 28.9
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.