Transcription
Providers using this tag (69)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 11 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 24 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 15 Limited public surface area
Emerging 10 Early or largely undocumented
Unrated 1 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (44)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 9 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 18 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 15 Limited public surface area
Emerging 1 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (25)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Transcription” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 65 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Transcription, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 47.4 | 26.5 | +20.9 | 65 |
| Contract Quality | 38.3 | 20.1 | +18.2 | 65 |
| Operational Transparency | 31.5 | 14 | +17.5 | 65 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 37.5 | 23.4 | +14.1 | 65 |
| Discoverability | 69.7 | 61 | +8.7 | 65 |
| Contract Governance | 9.9 | 6.5 | +3.4 | 65 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 23% | 10% | +13 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 32% | 13% | +19 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 21% | 11% | +10 |
| Security | 98% | 96% | +2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 2% | 2% | 0 |
| Governance rules | 18% | 13% | +5 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Fireflies.ai 70.3
- 2 TranscriptFetch 64.9
- 3 Spruce Health 64.2
- 4 Gong 62.9
- 5 PyannoteAI 61.4
- 6 Amazon Transcribe 58
- 7 Actionpower 57.2
- 8 Demodesk 56.6
- 9 Modulate 55.7
- 10 Read AI 55
- 1 Fireflies.ai 60.4
- 2 TranscriptFetch 58.1
- 3 Demodesk 57.7
- 4 Read AI 53.6
- 5 Kensho 51.1
- 6 Samu 48.6
- 7 Spruce Health 48.4
- 8 supernormal 48
- 9 Fellow 47.7
- 10 Gong 46.1
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.