Sandbox
SandboxesSandbox
Providers using this tag (30)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 9 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 9 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 9 Limited public surface area
APIs with this tag (65)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 7 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 19 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 24 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 9 Limited public surface area
Emerging 5 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (53)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Sandbox” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Show all 53 companies ↓
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 30 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Sandbox, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 59.2 | 23.4 | +35.8 | 30 |
| Contract Quality | 44.1 | 20.1 | +24 | 30 |
| Access Clarity | 44.3 | 26.5 | +17.8 | 30 |
| Operational Transparency | 31 | 14 | +17 | 30 |
| Discoverability | 71 | 61 | +10 | 30 |
| Contract Governance | 8.6 | 6.5 | +2.1 | 30 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 33% | 10% | +23 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 37% | 13% | +24 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 7% | 11% | -4 |
| Security | 100% | 96% | +4 |
| Arazzo workflows | 17% | 2% | +15 |
| Governance rules | 27% | 13% | +14 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 E2B 65.5
- 2 Modal 64.8
- 3 Koyeb 64.3
- 4 Runloop 61
- 5 Daytona 60.6
- 6 Freestyle 60.4
- 7 Dwolla 59.5
- 8 Prime Intellect 56.5
- 9 Composio 56.4
- 10 Dedalus Labs 51.8
- 1 Anchor Browser 57.1
- 2 Dwolla 52.9
- 3 Blaxel 44.6
- 4 Limrun 43
- 5 Dedalus Labs 40.7
- 6 Koyeb 39.8
- 7 Novita AI 35.8
- 8 Prime Intellect 33.7
- 9 Modal 33.5
- 10 Ardent 32.9
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.