Plans
Plansplans
Providers using this tag (91)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 4 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 13 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 33 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 36 Limited public surface area
Emerging 5 Early or largely undocumented
APIs with this tag (92)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 4 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 12 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 34 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 37 Limited public surface area
Emerging 5 Early or largely undocumented
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 91 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Plans, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 53.4 | 17.5 | +35.9 | 91 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 38.7 | 17.9 | +20.8 | 91 |
| Operational Transparency | 32 | 11.3 | +20.7 | 91 |
| Access Clarity | 41.2 | 22.3 | +18.9 | 91 |
| Discoverability | 71.3 | 60.4 | +10.9 | 91 |
| Contract Governance | 16.3 | 6.4 | +9.9 | 91 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 24% | 16% | +8 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 9% | 7% | +2 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 24% | 9% | +15 |
| Security | 100% | 88% | +12 |
| Arazzo workflows | 5% | 2% | +3 |
| Governance rules | 42% | 13% | +29 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services 85.2
- 2 Stripe 83.2
- 3 PAY.JP 78.6
- 4 Efí Pay (Gerencianet) 70.6
- 5 Curlec 66.3
- 6 Frontegg 63.3
- 7 Raygun 63.1
- 8 Kota 61.2
- 9 Lithium 60.2
- 10 Fieldwire 59.1
- 1 Automattic 62.3
- 2 Curlec 56.7
- 3 VideoAmp 53.1
- 4 Fever 52.7
- 5 Stripe 47.8
- 6 Kota 39.9
- 7 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services 39.7
- 8 Spredfast 37.9
- 9 Paid 37.2
- 10 Lithium 35.7
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.
MCP server
One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.
https://apis.io/mcp
Tools for tags
7 MCP tools reach this
find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
Call it yourself
curl for this page
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/plans"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/plans"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/plans/stats" \
-H "X-API-Key: $APIS_IO_KEY"
Discovery needs no key. Ratings and market analysis are Pro.