Providers using this tag (86)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 8 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 13 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 17 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 15 Limited public surface area
Emerging 26 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 7 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (42)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 10 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 1 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 7 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 8 Limited public surface area
Emerging 13 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 3 Almost no public developer surface
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 86 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged EHR, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 40.7 | 22.3 | +18.4 | 86 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 33.8 | 17.9 | +15.9 | 86 |
| Contract Quality | 31.4 | 17.5 | +13.9 | 86 |
| Operational Transparency | 23.3 | 11.3 | +12 | 86 |
| Discoverability | 72.1 | 60.4 | +11.7 | 86 |
| Contract Governance | 14.9 | 6.4 | +8.5 | 86 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 37% | 16% | +21 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 9% | 7% | +2 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 30% | 9% | +21 |
| Security | 100% | 88% | +12 |
| Arazzo workflows | 7% | 2% | +5 |
| Governance rules | 19% | 13% | +6 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Elation Health 84.1
- 2 drchrono 83.5
- 3 athenahealth 79.2
- 4 NextGen Healthcare 75.7
- 5 eClinicalWorks 74.9
- 6 Vital 74.7
- 7 Canvas Medical 70.1
- 8 Healthie 68.5
- 9 DoseSpot 65.5
- 10 Epic Systems 65.5
- 1 Jane 48.4
- 2 Elation Health 48.1
- 3 Aidbox 43.7
- 4 Amigo 43.5
- 5 Commure 42.2
- 6 eClinicalWorks 41.4
- 7 Vital 40.6
- 8 Epic Systems 39.7
- 9 NHS England 39.7
- 10 AdvancedMD 38.7
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.
MCP server
One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.
https://apis.io/mcp
Tools for tags
7 MCP tools reach this
find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
Call it yourself
curl for this page
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/ehr"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/ehr"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/ehr/stats" \
-H "X-API-Key: $APIS_IO_KEY"
Discovery needs no key. Ratings and market analysis are Pro.