EHR
Providers using this tag (79)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 9 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 14 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 16 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 14 Limited public surface area
Emerging 21 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 5 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (46)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 7 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 5 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 5 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 16 Limited public surface area
Emerging 11 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 2 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (11)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “EHR” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 79 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged EHR, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 42.9 | 26.5 | +16.4 | 79 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 37.4 | 23.4 | +14 | 79 |
| Contract Quality | 32.5 | 19.8 | +12.7 | 79 |
| Operational Transparency | 24.9 | 14 | +10.9 | 79 |
| Discoverability | 67.6 | 61.2 | +6.4 | 79 |
| Contract Governance | 12.2 | 6.4 | +5.8 | 79 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 10% | 10% | 0 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 10% | 13% | -3 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 33% | 11% | +22 |
| Security | 97% | 97% | 0 |
| Arazzo workflows | 8% | 2% | +6 |
| Governance rules | 16% | 14% | +2 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Elation Health 83.7
- 2 drchrono 80.9
- 3 athenahealth 76.7
- 4 eClinicalWorks 74.2
- 5 Vital 73.9
- 6 NextGen Healthcare 70.4
- 7 Healthie 68.2
- 8 Canvas Medical 67.8
- 9 Amigo 67.2
- 10 Tebra 65.4
- 1 Jane 50.9
- 2 Amigo 46.7
- 3 Aidbox 43.7
- 4 Elation Health 42.3
- 5 Cambio Healthcare Systems 42.3
- 6 Commure 42.2
- 7 eClinicalWorks 41.4
- 8 Vital 40.6
- 9 AdvancedMD 40.4
- 10 Particle Health 39.2
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.