Data Aggregation
Providers using this tag (89)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Developing 5 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 10 Limited public surface area
Emerging 25 Early or largely undocumented
Steinbach Credit UnionQuantiliaInvestCloudUMB BankKOHOAlterna SavingsF.N.B. CorporationEverBankCoast Capital SavingsCommerce BankCity National BankconnectFirst Credit UnionRaymond James BankCanadian Tire BankAmerica First Credit UnionBank of HawaiiFirst Hawaiian BankAssociated BankDesjardins GroupMidFirst BankTangerineM&T BankMarcus by Goldman SachsNational Bank of CanadaConexus Credit Union
Minimal 46 Almost no public developer surface
Webster BankAtlantic Union BankCIBCSimplii FinancialAffinity Credit UnionServus Credit UnionBank OZKBECUSecurity Service Federal Credit UnionCadence BankPC FinancialNeo FinancialOld National BankValley National BankColumbia BankProsperity BankTexas Capital BankSchoolsFirst FCUBarclays USFirst Nations Bank of CanadaSantander USRandolph-Brooks FCUATB FinancialFirst Tech Federal Credit UnionState Employees' Credit UnionPinnacle FinancialAlliant Credit UnionFlagstarPenFed Credit UnionProspera Credit UnionEquitable BankSallie Mae BankZions BancorporationVancityCanadian Western BankDCU (Digital Federal Credit Union)First West Credit UnionMeridian Credit UnionVyStar Credit UnionLaurentian Bank of CanadaGolden 1 Credit UnionManulife BankMountain America Credit UnionSuncoast Credit UnionAgencyKPIArk.com
APIs with this tag (9)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Strong 1 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 1 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 1 Limited public surface area
Emerging 5 Early or largely undocumented
FNB Consumer Data Access (Aggregator-Only)F.N.B. Corporation publishes no first-party developer API. Consumer-permissioned account, balance and trans...Raymond James Bank Consumer Data Access (Aggregator-Only)Raymond James Bank exposes no first-party public API. Consumer-permissioned account and transaction data is...Wintrust Open Banking Data Access (Plaid, aggregator-mediated)Wintrust does not expose a direct consumer open-banking API. Third-party applications reach Wintrust / iBus...Marcus Consumer Data Access (Aggregator-Only)Marcus by Goldman Sachs does not publish a first-party consumer developer API. Consumer-permissioned accoun...National Bank Consumer Data Access (Aggregator-Mediated)National Bank of Canada exposes no public, self-serve first-party developer API. Consumer financial-data ac...
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (3)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Data Aggregation” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Frequency
54.6
log-scaled weighted occurrences
Breadth
2.3
spread across providers
Quality lift
19.2
mean composite of providers using it
Cohesion
15.0
strength of nearest seed neighbor
Related tags
Open Finance 47 co-occurrences
Credit Union 27 co-occurrences
Consumer-Driven Banking 15 co-occurrences
Regional Bank 14 co-occurrences
United States 45 co-occurrences
Banking 72 co-occurrences
Cooperative 11 co-occurrences
Interac 10 co-occurrences
Where this tag comes from
Provider tag89
Api tag9
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 87 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Data Aggregation, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
Providers
87
of 89 in the catalog
Mean Kin Score
16.1
-6.8 vs catalog 22.9
Mean Agent Readiness
7
-4.9 vs catalog 11.9
Spread
2.4–86.1
median 10.9 · σ 15
How the 87 split by band
Exemplar 1Strong 2Developing 5Thin 10Emerging 25Minimal 44
Facet averages, against the whole catalog
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Discoverability | 57 | 58.1 | -1.1 | 87 |
| Contract Governance | 3.5 | 6.3 | -2.8 | 87 |
| Access Clarity | 22 | 26.5 | -4.5 | 87 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 17.2 | 23.2 | -6 | 87 |
| Operational Transparency | 6.5 | 13.7 | -7.2 | 87 |
| Contract Quality | 8.6 | 17.6 | -9 | 87 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
What this cohort publishes
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 9% | 14% | -5 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 8% | 12% | -4 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 11% | 11% | 0 |
| Security | 100% | 98% | +2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 5% | 14% | -9 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
Top by Kin Score
- 1 Plaid 86.1
- 2 ReefAPI 57.7
- 3 Moneyhub 57.1
- 4 AltScore 47.9
- 5 Finicity 47.2
- 6 HonestHook 45
- 7 Green Check Verified 42.4
- 8 ScrapingBee 41.4
- 9 Oddpool 39
- 10 Apify 37
Top by Agent Readiness
- 1 Apify 52.9
- 2 Plaid 52.2
- 3 Green Check Verified 45.7
- 4 Import.io 44.6
- 5 Moneyhub 42.4
- 6 ReefAPI 34.9
- 7 HonestHook 33.3
- 8 AltScore 31.7
- 9 Flanks 30.2
- 10 Tenzo 27.3
All 89 members of this roster resolve to a provider in the
catalog; 87 carry a score (98%).
The figures above describe the scored members only.
Coverage caveat. 82 of 87 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 5 October 2026, across 29093 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Coverage caveat. 82 of 87 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 5 October 2026, across 29093 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.