Self-Service
Self ServiceSelf-Service
Providers using this tag (28)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 4 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 7 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 9 Limited public surface area
Emerging 4 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 4 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (20)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Strong 6 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 4 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 8 Limited public surface area
Emerging 1 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 28 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Self-Service, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 34.1 | 17.5 | +16.6 | 28 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 33.2 | 17.9 | +15.3 | 28 |
| Access Clarity | 35.1 | 22.3 | +12.8 | 28 |
| Operational Transparency | 22.4 | 11.3 | +11.1 | 28 |
| Contract Governance | 14.2 | 6.4 | +7.8 | 28 |
| Discoverability | 63.6 | 60.4 | +3.2 | 28 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 21% | 16% | +5 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 4% | 7% | -3 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 21% | 9% | +12 |
| Security | 93% | 88% | +5 |
| Arazzo workflows | 11% | 2% | +9 |
| Governance rules | 32% | 13% | +19 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 ServiceNow 64.8
- 2 Gladly 57
- 3 Telia Company 55.2
- 4 Oracle Enterprise Manager 54.6
- 5 Auth0 53.4
- 6 Veritas NetBackup 50.7
- 7 Amazon Proton 50.6
- 8 VMware 47.7
- 9 Cycloid 45
- 10 Port 44.1
- 1 Telia Company 48.1
- 2 ServiceNow 35.3
- 3 Gladly 34.9
- 4 Auth0 34.7
- 5 Veritas NetBackup 32.3
- 6 Commonwealth Bank 29
- 7 Oracle Enterprise Manager 27.7
- 8 Cycloid 25.4
- 9 VMware 24.8
- 10 Port 24
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.
MCP server
One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.
https://apis.io/mcp
Tools for tags
7 MCP tools reach this
find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
Call it yourself
curl for this page
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/self-service"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/self-service"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/self-service/stats" \
-H "X-API-Key: $APIS_IO_KEY"
Discovery needs no key. Ratings and market analysis are Pro.