Learning Management
Providers using this tag (73)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 3 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 2 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 14 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 28 Limited public surface area
Emerging 21 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 4 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 1 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (74)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Strong 4 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 17 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 40 Limited public surface area
Emerging 13 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (38)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Learning Management” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 71 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Learning Management, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 40.3 | 26.5 | +13.8 | 71 |
| Operational Transparency | 21.8 | 14 | +7.8 | 71 |
| Discoverability | 66.4 | 61.2 | +5.2 | 71 |
| Contract Quality | 24.7 | 19.8 | +4.9 | 71 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 26.9 | 23.4 | +3.5 | 71 |
| Contract Governance | 8.2 | 6.4 | +1.8 | 71 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 7% | 10% | -3 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 7% | 13% | -6 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 22% | 11% | +11 |
| Security | 99% | 97% | +2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 3% | 2% | +1 |
| Governance rules | 14% | 14% | 0 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 ThriveCart 71.8
- 2 Canvas LMS 71.7
- 3 WorkRamp 67.6
- 4 Go1 62.8
- 5 MedTrainer 60.1
- 6 Hotmart 52.9
- 7 Ethena 52.6
- 8 Cloud Academy 51.5
- 9 Goethena 48.7
- 10 Mindtickle 48.3
- 1 Goethena 53.4
- 2 Ethena 43
- 3 Cybrary 39.8
- 4 Go1 38.3
- 5 ThriveCart 37.9
- 6 Mindtickle 37.1
- 7 Canvas LMS 33.3
- 8 MedTrainer 33.1
- 9 WorkRamp 32.9
- 10 Cloud Academy 31.5
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.