Knowledge
Knowledgeknowledge
Providers using this tag (40)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 5 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 16 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 11 Limited public surface area
Emerging 5 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 2 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (35)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 5 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 17 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 9 Limited public surface area
Emerging 3 Early or largely undocumented
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 40 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Knowledge, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 46.1 | 17.5 | +28.6 | 40 |
| Access Clarity | 42.7 | 22.3 | +20.4 | 40 |
| Operational Transparency | 30.9 | 11.3 | +19.6 | 40 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 33.4 | 17.9 | +15.5 | 40 |
| Discoverability | 73.8 | 60.4 | +13.4 | 40 |
| Contract Governance | 14.5 | 6.4 | +8.1 | 40 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 35% | 16% | +19 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 23% | 7% | +16 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 23% | 9% | +14 |
| Security | 100% | 88% | +12 |
| Arazzo workflows | 5% | 2% | +3 |
| Governance rules | 25% | 13% | +12 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Salesforce 83.3
- 2 Vendasta 63.3
- 3 Anam.ai 58.8
- 4 Jasper 58.5
- 5 Automattic 56.8
- 6 Anam 55.4
- 7 D-ID 53.2
- 8 Genesys 52.7
- 9 Salesforce Experience Cloud 49.7
- 10 Agno 49
- 1 Automattic 62.3
- 2 Genesys 55.1
- 3 Salesforce 52.2
- 4 Jasper 51.5
- 5 Langdock 42.6
- 6 Aptly 40.1
- 7 Anam.ai 36.2
- 8 StakPak 34.3
- 9 Vendasta 34.3
- 10 Osmosis 34.2
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.
MCP server
One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.
https://apis.io/mcp
Tools for tags
7 MCP tools reach this
find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
Call it yourself
curl for this page
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/knowledge"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/knowledge"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/knowledge/stats" \
-H "X-API-Key: $APIS_IO_KEY"
Discovery needs no key. Ratings and market analysis are Pro.