Gateway
Gatewaygateway
Providers using this tag (63)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 13 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 25 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 20 Limited public surface area
Emerging 5 Early or largely undocumented
APIs with this tag (49)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Strong 8 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 18 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 18 Limited public surface area
Emerging 5 Early or largely undocumented
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 63 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Gateway, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 51 | 17.5 | +33.5 | 63 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 44.2 | 17.9 | +26.3 | 63 |
| Operational Transparency | 31.7 | 11.3 | +20.4 | 63 |
| Access Clarity | 35.4 | 22.3 | +13.1 | 63 |
| Discoverability | 72 | 60.4 | +11.6 | 63 |
| Contract Governance | 16.6 | 6.4 | +10.2 | 63 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 37% | 16% | +21 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 10% | 7% | +3 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 16% | 9% | +7 |
| Security | 100% | 88% | +12 |
| Arazzo workflows | 10% | 2% | +8 |
| Governance rules | 52% | 13% | +39 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 8x8 67.1
- 2 Consumer Data Right (Energy) 63.4
- 3 Pocket Network 62.4
- 4 Compresr 61.4
- 5 HookLogic (Criteo) 59.8
- 6 Criteo 59
- 7 Microsoft Azure API Management 58
- 8 Cisco Secure Firewall 57.8
- 9 Dedalus Labs 56.2
- 10 Fat Zebra 56.2
- 1 Clawvisor 52.2
- 2 Criteo 45
- 3 8x8 43.3
- 4 Dedalus Labs 42.8
- 5 Oracle 41.9
- 6 LianLian Global 41.7
- 7 Cisco Secure Firewall 39.6
- 8 HookLogic (Criteo) 39.4
- 9 Till Payments 35.4
- 10 SigNoz 35.1
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.