AI Gateway
AI Gatewayai gatewayaiGateway
Providers using this tag (30)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Developing 16 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 5 Limited public surface area
APIs with this tag (29)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 4 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 10 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 14 Limited public surface area
Companies reaching this through an API (6)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “AI Gateway” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 30 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged AI Gateway, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 58 | 23.4 | +34.6 | 30 |
| Contract Quality | 50 | 19.8 | +30.2 | 30 |
| Operational Transparency | 40.3 | 14 | +26.3 | 30 |
| Access Clarity | 52.5 | 26.5 | +26 | 30 |
| Discoverability | 70.5 | 61.2 | +9.3 | 30 |
| Contract Governance | 15.7 | 6.4 | +9.3 | 30 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 40% | 10% | +30 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 30% | 13% | +17 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 10% | 11% | -1 |
| Security | 100% | 97% | +3 |
| Arazzo workflows | 10% | 2% | +8 |
| Governance rules | 53% | 14% | +39 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Microsoft Azure API Management 67
- 2 Cloudflare 65.1
- 3 Solo.io 62.3
- 4 Zuplo 59.4
- 5 Eden AI 59.1
- 6 Edgee 58.1
- 7 Kong 58
- 8 Insforge 57.9
- 9 Gravitee 56.8
- 10 Cloudflare AI Gateway 54.2
- 1 Insforge 57.7
- 2 Cloudflare 49.6
- 3 Eden AI 44.6
- 4 Solo.io 37.6
- 5 RouterPlex 37.2
- 6 LangWatch 36.3
- 7 Bifrost 34.9
- 8 Kong 33.2
- 9 Edgee 33.1
- 10 Zuplo 31.7
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.