AI Gateway
AI GatewaysAI Gateway
Providers using this tag (39)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 4 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 16 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 13 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 6 Limited public surface area
APIs with this tag (37)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 8 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 4 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 7 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 18 Limited public surface area
Companies reaching this through an API (13)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “AI Gateway” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 38 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged AI Gateway, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 60.4 | 24.5 | +35.9 | 38 |
| Access Clarity | 60.6 | 30 | +30.6 | 38 |
| Contract Quality | 48.7 | 18.6 | +30.1 | 38 |
| Operational Transparency | 41.7 | 13.2 | +28.5 | 38 |
| Contract Governance | 24.9 | 9.7 | +15.2 | 38 |
| Discoverability | 71.2 | 59.1 | +12.1 | 38 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 47% | 18% | +29 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 42% | 16% | +26 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 8% | 13% | -5 |
| Security | 100% | 99% | +1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 11% | 1% | +10 |
| Governance rules | 92% | 36% | +56 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Cloudflare 82.5
- 2 Microsoft Azure API Management 78.5
- 3 Kong 73.8
- 4 Zuplo 72.8
- 5 Gravitee 66.2
- 6 Eden AI 64.2
- 7 Insforge 63.7
- 8 2s 62.7
- 9 Vercel 62.5
- 10 Edgee 62.4
- 1 Cloudflare 69.6
- 2 Zuplo 57.3
- 3 Insforge 56.6
- 4 2s 48.5
- 5 Eden AI 47.4
- 6 Vercel 45.2
- 7 Kong 44.3
- 8 Cloudflare AI Gateway 43.9
- 9 AIHubMix 43
- 10 Bifrost 40.1
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.