Engagement
Engagementengagement
Providers using this tag (32)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 9 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 6 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 9 Limited public surface area
Emerging 7 Early or largely undocumented
APIs with this tag (22)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Strong 6 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 4 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 5 Limited public surface area
Emerging 7 Early or largely undocumented
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 32 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Engagement, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 45.6 | 17.5 | +28.1 | 32 |
| Access Clarity | 48.4 | 22.3 | +26.1 | 32 |
| Operational Transparency | 33.5 | 11.3 | +22.2 | 32 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 36.7 | 17.9 | +18.8 | 32 |
| Discoverability | 74.1 | 60.4 | +13.7 | 32 |
| Contract Governance | 15.3 | 6.4 | +8.9 | 32 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 34% | 16% | +18 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 25% | 7% | +18 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 28% | 9% | +19 |
| Security | 100% | 88% | +12 |
| Arazzo workflows | 6% | 2% | +4 |
| Governance rules | 34% | 13% | +21 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Matomo 67.3
- 2 AppsFlyer 66.9
- 3 Gong 66.4
- 4 Benchmark Email 64.6
- 5 Apollo.io 64.2
- 6 Confluence 63.7
- 7 Dotdigital 63.4
- 8 Hootsuite 63.3
- 9 Antavo 62
- 10 Cellulant 54.7
- 1 Apollo.io 55.3
- 2 Confluence 50
- 3 AppsFlyer 49.7
- 4 Gong 46.1
- 5 Dotdigital 41.8
- 6 Hootsuite 41.8
- 7 Spredfast 37.9
- 8 Matomo 37.8
- 9 Antavo 34
- 10 Return Path 34
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.