Agent Skills
AgentSkillAgent Skills
Providers using this tag (74)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 5 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 24 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 22 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 15 Limited public surface area
Emerging 5 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 3 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (15)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Strong 2 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 10 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 2 Limited public surface area
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (2)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Agent Skills” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 73 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Agent Skills, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 57.2 | 23.2 | +34 | 73 |
| Operational Transparency | 39.8 | 13.7 | +26.1 | 73 |
| Access Clarity | 50.6 | 26.5 | +24.1 | 73 |
| Contract Quality | 35.6 | 17.6 | +18 | 73 |
| Discoverability | 70.4 | 58.1 | +12.3 | 73 |
| Contract Governance | 14.7 | 6.3 | +8.4 | 73 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 68% | 14% | +54 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 68% | 12% | +56 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 38% | 11% | +27 |
| Security | 97% | 98% | -1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 5% | 2% | +3 |
| Governance rules | 12% | 14% | -2 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 APIs.io 90.1
- 2 Cracked API 70.3
- 3 Unify 70
- 4 SMTP2GO 69
- 5 Infer by Flow7 65.7
- 6 Erxes 65.6
- 7 KonbiniAPI 65.1
- 8 Lacuna 64.9
- 9 ClickFunnels 64.4
- 10 Parallel Web Systems 62.8
- 1 APIs.io 75.3
- 2 Cracked API 68.5
- 3 Amazon Selling Partner API 64.6
- 4 DeveloperHub 61.9
- 5 Daloopa 61.5
- 6 Parallel Web Systems 60.2
- 7 APIContext 60.1
- 8 Unify 60
- 9 Lacuna 57.2
- 10 KonbiniAPI 56.1
Coverage caveat. 49 of 73 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 5 October 2026, across 29093 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.