Tooling
Providers using this tag (44)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 2 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Developing 11 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 16 Limited public surface area
Emerging 12 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 3 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (44)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Developing 11 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 19 Limited public surface area
Emerging 12 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 44 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Tooling, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operational Transparency | 30.1 | 11.3 | +18.8 | 44 |
| Contract Quality | 31.5 | 17.5 | +14 | 44 |
| Access Clarity | 33.4 | 22.3 | +11.1 | 44 |
| Discoverability | 71 | 60.4 | +10.6 | 44 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 28.4 | 17.9 | +10.5 | 44 |
| Contract Governance | 9.6 | 6.4 | +3.2 | 44 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 9% | 16% | -7 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 7% | 7% | 0 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 7% | 9% | -2 |
| Security | 100% | 88% | +12 |
| Arazzo workflows | 2% | 2% | 0 |
| Governance rules | 34% | 13% | +21 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Salesforce 83.3
- 2 API Evangelist 69.8
- 3 Transcend 50.5
- 4 PlayFab 49.8
- 5 Bazel 48.2
- 6 Mercado Pago 47.5
- 7 Aligned News 47.1
- 8 RESO (Real Estate Standards Organization) 45.8
- 9 Salesforce Flow 42.6
- 10 Microsoft .NET 41.9
- 1 Salesforce 52.2
- 2 API Evangelist 44.8
- 3 Spree Commerce 41.4
- 4 RESO (Real Estate Standards Organization) 32.2
- 5 Transcend 26.1
- 6 Salesforce Flow 24.8
- 7 Wasmer 24.8
- 8 Mercado Pago 24.7
- 9 Aligned News 22.9
- 10 Bazel 22.9
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.
MCP server
One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.
https://apis.io/mcp
Tools for tags
7 MCP tools reach this
find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
Call it yourself
curl for this page
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/tooling"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/tooling"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/tooling/stats" \
-H "X-API-Key: $APIS_IO_KEY"
Discovery needs no key. Ratings and market analysis are Pro.