Scholarly Publishing
Academic PublishingScientific PublishingScholarly Publishing
Providers using this tag (30)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 1 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 2 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 9 Limited public surface area
Emerging 15 Early or largely undocumented
APIs with this tag (69)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Strong 1 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 6 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 22 Limited public surface area
Emerging 40 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (36)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Scholarly Publishing” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 29 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Scholarly Publishing, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 29.4 | 17.6 | +11.8 | 29 |
| Access Clarity | 33.2 | 26.5 | +6.7 | 29 |
| Operational Transparency | 20.2 | 13.7 | +6.5 | 29 |
| Discoverability | 63.8 | 58.1 | +5.7 | 29 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 26.8 | 23.2 | +3.6 | 29 |
| Contract Governance | 9 | 6.3 | +2.7 | 29 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 3% | 14% | -11 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 0% | 12% | -12 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 17% | 11% | +6 |
| Security | 100% | 98% | +2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 34% | 14% | +20 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Elsevier 57
- 2 arXiv 48.1
- 3 University of Bonn 47.5
- 4 Gadjah Mada University 42
- 5 IEEE Xplore 41.4
- 6 Al-Farabi Kazakh National University 39
- 7 Carnegie Mellon University 38.7
- 8 Springer Nature 37.8
- 9 University of Pittsburgh 36
- 10 University of Los Andes Colombia 33.7
- 1 Elsevier 40.3
- 2 IEEE Xplore 35.4
- 3 Carnegie Mellon University 32.1
- 4 Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS 27.1
- 5 University of Los Andes Colombia 26.7
- 6 Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 26.7
- 7 Autonomous University of Barcelona 26.7
- 8 Universiti Putra Malaysia 26.7
- 9 University of Navarra 26.7
- 10 Springer Nature 26.5
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.