Institutional Repository
Providers using this tag (62)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 2 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 19 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 36 Limited public surface area
Emerging 5 Early or largely undocumented
APIs with this tag (80)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Developing 29 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 42 Limited public surface area
Emerging 8 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (20)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Institutional Repository” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 62 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Institutional Repository, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 41.8 | 26.5 | +15.3 | 62 |
| Contract Quality | 33.5 | 20.1 | +13.4 | 62 |
| Operational Transparency | 22.3 | 14 | +8.3 | 62 |
| Contract Governance | 14.5 | 6.5 | +8 | 62 |
| Discoverability | 68.9 | 61 | +7.9 | 62 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 27.9 | 23.4 | +4.5 | 62 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 0% | 10% | -10 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 2% | 13% | -11 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 24% | 11% | +13 |
| Security | 100% | 96% | +4 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 48% | 13% | +35 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 University of Michigan-Ann Arbor 59.2
- 2 University of Helsinki 55
- 3 Uppsala University 54.1
- 4 University of Bonn 53.4
- 5 Taylor's University 51.4
- 6 Seoul National University 50.8
- 7 University of Texas at Austin 50.6
- 8 University of Lausanne 49.6
- 9 Utrecht University 47.3
- 10 Lancaster University 46.2
- 1 Queensland University of Technology 34.7
- 2 Massey University 33.3
- 3 Carnegie Mellon University 32.1
- 4 University of Ottawa 30.4
- 5 University of Michigan-Ann Arbor 30
- 6 Keio University 28.7
- 7 University of Geneva 28.5
- 8 University of Helsinki 28
- 9 University of Texas at Austin 28
- 10 Taylor's University 27.7
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.