Properties
Propertiesproperties
Providers using this tag (71)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 6 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 17 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 19 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 25 Limited public surface area
Emerging 4 Early or largely undocumented
APIs with this tag (77)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 6 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 19 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 21 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 26 Limited public surface area
Emerging 5 Early or largely undocumented
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 71 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Properties, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 58.1 | 17.5 | +40.6 | 71 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 43.5 | 17.9 | +25.6 | 71 |
| Access Clarity | 46 | 22.3 | +23.7 | 71 |
| Operational Transparency | 33.9 | 11.3 | +22.6 | 71 |
| Discoverability | 72.9 | 60.4 | +12.5 | 71 |
| Contract Governance | 18.6 | 6.4 | +12.2 | 71 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 39% | 16% | +23 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 25% | 7% | +18 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 42% | 9% | +33 |
| Security | 99% | 88% | +11 |
| Arazzo workflows | 21% | 2% | +19 |
| Governance rules | 51% | 13% | +38 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 HubSpot 82.4
- 2 Adobe Launch 74.7
- 3 API Evangelist 69.8
- 4 Google Analytics 4 69
- 5 BlueConic 68.8
- 6 Google Analytics 68.4
- 7 Factset 64.8
- 8 Bentley Systems 64.1
- 9 Zillapi 63.8
- 10 Confluence 63.7
- 1 Zillapi 58.3
- 2 Chariot 55.8
- 3 HubSpot 54.4
- 4 Salsify 53.4
- 5 Factset 52.8
- 6 Confluence 50
- 7 BlueConic 47
- 8 Avalara 46.9
- 9 API Evangelist 44.8
- 10 AlterEstate 44.1
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.
MCP server
One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.
https://apis.io/mcp
Tools for tags
7 MCP tools reach this
find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
Call it yourself
curl for this page
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/properties"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/properties"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/properties/stats" \
-H "X-API-Key: $APIS_IO_KEY"
Discovery needs no key. Ratings and market analysis are Pro.