Data Collection
Providers using this tag (35)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 2 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 4 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 12 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 10 Limited public surface area
Emerging 2 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 5 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (13)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 4 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 3 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Thin 2 Limited public surface area
Emerging 3 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (11)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Data Collection” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 33 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Data Collection, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 41.3 | 17.6 | +23.7 | 33 |
| Operational Transparency | 29.5 | 13.7 | +15.8 | 33 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 38.8 | 23.2 | +15.6 | 33 |
| Access Clarity | 41.5 | 26.5 | +15 | 33 |
| Discoverability | 66.7 | 58.1 | +8.6 | 33 |
| Contract Governance | 14.7 | 6.3 | +8.4 | 33 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 15% | 14% | +1 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 15% | 12% | +3 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 15% | 11% | +4 |
| Security | 100% | 98% | +2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 15% | 2% | +13 |
| Governance rules | 48% | 14% | +34 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Adobe Launch 74.8
- 2 Tealium 67.6
- 3 123FormBuilder 59.4
- 4 TrueProxies 56.5
- 5 Wufoo 56
- 6 Forsta 55.7
- 7 Cint 52.9
- 8 Prolific 52.8
- 9 ScrapingAnt 51.2
- 10 Keen 49.3
- 1 FormAssembly 50.4
- 2 Cint 44.8
- 3 TrueProxies 36.7
- 4 Forsta 35.4
- 5 Google Forms 35.1
- 6 Tealium 34.2
- 7 Adobe Launch 32.9
- 8 ScrapingAnt 32.4
- 9 Sensors Data 30.7
- 10 123FormBuilder 30.6
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.